Pages

Friday, December 31, 2021

A-Town Playlist: Top Spotify Songs of 2021

 


You know, I wasn't great at blogging this year. But today, on New Year's Eve, I knew that there was one thing I really needed to do - write up a quick blog about my Spotify Wrapped for 2021. I've done this a couple years in a row, now, and it would be a shame if I didn't put together a lovely little post about my listening habits this year.

This year, I didn't listen to as much music as I typically do because I spent a ton of time watching movies and TV - and I kept track of everything I watched, too - (insert facepalm emoji) - because I'm weird. Nevertheless, Spotify used their super secret stats and algorithms to tally up my 6,918 minutes of music and tell me what I like to listen to. I just did the math and that's 115 hours of music, so that's not nothing, so let's take a look at what I did in 2021.


Spotify Wrapped - Top 10 Songs

Here are, allegedly - and that's a BIG "allegedly" - the 10 songs I listened to most this year.

  1. Island in the Sun - Weezer
  2. Could Have Been Me - The Struts
  3. Dela - Johnny Clegg, Savuka
  4. Brooklyn Bridge to Chorus - The Strokes
  5. Kings & Queens - Ava Max
  6. Run-Around - Blues Traveler
  7. Stacy's Mom - Fountains of Wayne
  8. Two Princes - Spin Doctors
  9. Instant Crush - Daft Punk (feat. Julian Casablancas)
  10. Another Hit of Showmanship - The Struts (feat. Albert Hammond Jr.)

Analysis: A couple observations. This is, by far, the most random and fun Top 10 I've had since I started making these year-end blogs. For crying out loud, that song from "George of the Jungle" is Number 3! Got a couple songs by The Struts, a song by The Strokes and a song by The Struts featuring a member of The Strokes, not to mention the Daft Punk/Strokes collab that came in at Number 9. Six, Seven and Eight are certainly three songs I listened to on repeat while driving several times, and, perhaps my proudest accomplishment of all is that Ava Max cracked the Top Five. Despite it's somewhat feminist overtones, "Kings & Queens" is, as the kids say, a real banger.

Now, let's talk about "Island in the Sun." There is NO WAY that "Island in the Sun" was my top song of the year. I highly doubt that it was even my top Weezer song of the year, so I'd be curious to learn Spotify's reasoning behind that one. Looking back, it was Number 4 in 2020, so something's going on to make Spotify think that I really love that song, but one thing is for certain: I'm going to do whatever I can to avoid listening to it at all in 2022.

Top Genres & Artists

Something that Spotify got right was my top genres for the year. No complaints about this list:



Also unsurprisingly, here are my top artists of the year:


Vampire Weekend might be somewhat debatable; there was a point in time, when their most recent album came out, when I listened to them a whole lot. I'm not sure how much I actually listened to them this year, but I'm also not sure who would take their place in the Top 5 if they got booted. Maybe Elton John, Queen or The Goo Goo Dolls? But yeah, I think this is probably right.

Looking back on previous blogs, this marks the fourth time that Weezer has been in my Top 5 artists. Bob Seger has also made the cut for three years in a row now, which is a testament to his classic discography. Gotta love Bobby Boy. Upon further inspection, it looks like Vampire Weekend knocked The Goo Goo Dolls out of the Top 5 for the first time in three years. Maybe they'll bounce back next year. Finally, congratulations to The Strokes, who entered the revered Top 5 for the first time - an accomplishment they can be proud of, for sure. Well deserved, gentlemen.

2021... as a Movie?

This year's Spotify Wrapped provided a look at what the soundtrack from the movie of my year would have been... or something. I don't know. It was kind of goofy and kind of interesting, but, if you're curious, here's what they came up with:



I mean... I'd probably watch it.

Other Fun Songs in My Top 100


Condensed Playlist

I've shortened the list to 50 songs, for your listening enjoyment. You can find it embedded below or hyperlinked here.




A Final Fun Fact

I learned this year that Spotify only tracks your listening stats until October 31 each year, so feel free to listen to whatever crap you want, once November rolls around, but keep in mind that if you're still listening to Michael Buble's Christmas album on January 1 of the new year, there's a chance that "Holiday Music" could be on your list of top genres for your next Spotify Wrapped.

That's about it for now, friends. Thanks for sticking with Signs of the Times for another glorious calendar year. We'll catch you on the flip side.

Oh, and remember - all of our problems aren't going to magically disappear at the stroke of midnight like everyone thought would happen on January 1, 2021. Later!

Monday, October 18, 2021

DC FanDome: The Flash movie sneak peek


Rumors have swirled about casting for the upcoming "Flash" movie, which will likely push the DCEU multiverse to its absolute limits. The prevailing theory is that this film will depict the "Flashpoint Paradox" story arc and serve as a virtual reset for the DC universe on the big screen. DC FanDome 2021 gave us the quickest of glimpses into what is to come... but first, Ezra Miller, ladies and gentlemen:




That is quite the look.

Let's break down what we saw in the tiny teaser:

  • A voiceover - sounds like Michael Keaton - asks Barry why, if he can go to any timeline or universe, why he stays to fight to save the one he's currently in.
  • A license plate informs us that Barry Allen is going home to Central City.
  • We see Barry, in costume, standing outside what we presume to be his childhood home. A second later, we see him inside the home, approaching a woman (probably his deceased mother) from behind. He touches her on the shoulder and startles her.
  • We see a quick cut of Michael Keaton's iconic Batman cowl on a bloody floor.
  • Barry approaches a body that seems to be suspended several feet in the air.
  • We see Barry spray painting and assembling a new superhero outfit, then get a nice shot of him, suited up, near a waterfall. Is that the Batcave?
  • Yeah, it's the Batcave. We see the head of Michael Keaton's Batman, from behind. Sweet! Barry, flanked by what could possibly be versions of The Flash from different timelines, asks, "Are you him?
  • Cut to the movie logo. Looks good.
  • In the final scene, we see Barry nervously looking around and approaching something covered with a sheet. That's the Batmobile, for sure. As he goes to pull the sheet off, the teaser ends.
"The Flash" is currently in production and will have a theatrical release sometime in 2022.

Here's the full teaser:

Saturday, October 16, 2021

DC FanDome 2021: Suicide Squad - Kill the Justice League

 


DC FanDome 2021 gave us a much better idea of what we'll be getting ourselves into with the upcoming video game "Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League."

It's been a wild year for "Task Force X." Hot on the heels of their tremendously R-rated big screen reboot, DC's best bad guys are gearing up for their first stand-alone video game adventure, and their task is to (allegedly) kill the Justice League. However, in the newest trailer for the game, it looks like their mission might not be that straight forward.

From what it looks like, there is something a little bit off about Superman and the gang; it seems like they've been poisoned or drugged - or something. So the story could potentially be that the Suicide Squad has been assigned to take out some kind of possessed version of the heroes.




The trailer focuses on what appears to be the core team featured in the game: Harley Quinn, Deadshot, Captain Boomerang and King Shark, but also shows a handful of other characters (good and bad), including the following:

  • Amanda Waller
  • Brainiac
  • Gizmo
  • Penguin
  • Superman
  • Wonder Woman
  • Green Lantern
  • Flash
Other locations and items of note popped up throughout the trailer, such as Arkham Asylum, a makeshift Batmobile, LexCorp and a possible cameo by Javelin.

While no official MPAA rating has been announced yet, "Suicide Squad: KTJL" does not look like a game intended for young audiences. Mild profanity is heard occasionally throughout the video, but violence looks prevalent and that exploding head (along with King Shark's pleading that Waller do the same to an incapacitated Penguin) makes it seem like we're probably in for an "M" rating upon release.

Rocksteady has a reputation for releasing incredible superhero games, so their first venture into next-gen consoles (are we still calling things "next-gen"?) will likely make "Suicide Squad" a Game of the Year contender when it hits shelves in 2022 for Playstation
, XBox and PC.

Check out the full trailer below:


DC FanDome 2021: Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom

 


In a quick peek at "Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom" during DC FanDome 2021, Jason Momoa expressed his happiness to be back at work, after a couple years of environmental activism.

""I'm super excited to be back making a sequel," Momoa said. "I have so much invested into it. I love this character, I love what it represents. There's nothing that I've ever been a part of that's like this."

"I think fans are going to be really happy," Momoa continued. "It's going to be a fun adventure, like it was the first time, just better."

"Like the comicbook, the world of Aquaman is so big and so rich," director James Wan said. Wan and producer Peter Safran would go on to explain that "Aquaman 2" will provide a more mature, colorful, globe-trotting adventure that maintains the fun and heart of the first movie.

The short DC FanDome featurette also confirmed the return of Black Manta, Oceanmaster and Mera. Most importantly, however, it looks like we're going to get Aquaman on a seahorse, which is terrific.

"Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom" hits theaters on December 16, 2022. You can watch the full presentation below:


DC FanDome 2021: Black Adam teaser

 


DC FanDome is back! It's hard to believe that 14 months have passed since DC Comics' groundbreaking virtual convention debuted in August 2020. This year, DC presented several new trailers, teasers and glimpses at their upcoming film, television and video game projects, and they kicked things off with a look into Dwayne Johnson's highly anticipated movie, "Black Adam."

Johnson's "Black Adam" co-stars Pierce Brosnan, Aldis Hodge, Quintessa Swindell, Noah Centineo made quick appearances to introduce the movie.

"I've never seen the likes of it before," Brosnan said. "Having done James Bond for 10 years, four films, nothing compares to this."

"He's more brutal, uncompromising, fueled by the depths of his pain," Hodge said, of Johnson's titular character, who will presumably end up in a collision course with Zachary Levi's Shazam at some point in time.

"This film, this character, this universe has been a huge passion project of mine for a very long time," Johnson said. "I have worked so hard ... on this project because it's the kind of project that, I know, comes along once in a lifetime, and the truth is, I was born to play Black Adam."

FanDome showed off some concept art of what appears to be Black Adam's home land of Kahndaq, which seems absolutely massive, and it sounds like the movie will have action and adventure on just as grand of a scale.




"The film has, without question, some of the biggest action sequences I have ever been a part of," Johnson said. He also announced that the movie is officially in the post-production phase, before launching into the first-ever teaser trailer for "Black Adam." Check it out below:




That, folks, does not look like a man you'd want to mess with. Dwayne Johnson and Pierce Brosnan's crew of superhero counterparts will smash their way to theaters on July 29, 2022. Can't wait!

Sunday, October 10, 2021

MLB TV Viewing Stats - 2021


So, I do this terribly nerdy thing, where I watch a lot of baseball games and keep track of a bunch of totally meaningless statistics that I know nobody else cares about. I've blogged about my findings for four seasons, now, so it's just become a tradition and I have to do it. Otherwise, all that data is actually good for nothing and a complete waste of my time.

More than anything else, I just need to get this information down, in black and white, so that I'm at peace with myself and my ridiculous obsession. I don't expect anyone to read this blog, but nevertheless, here it is, anyway.

I won't explain too much more. If you've made it this far, you probably know what you've gotten yourself into, so let's just get down to the nitty-gritty and break down all these numbers.



All the Stats You Never Knew You Needed:

I kept track of all the same stats I've monitored for the past few seasons, which are as follows:

  • Road team
  • Home team
  • Broadcast (which team's TV feed I tuned into)
  • Winning team
  • W/L result of the team whose broadcast I watched
  • Duration of viewing
    • 1-2 innings: "Minimal"
    • 3-4 innings: "Partial"
    • 5-7 innings: "Most"
    • 8-9 innings: "Full"
  • Any interesting notes about the game


Persisting Factors that Affected Viewing Habits:

  • As usual, MLB TV blacked out all home games for the Arizona Diamondback and Colorado Rockies. It's stupid, given that I live in Utah, but that's just the way it is.
  • Any nationally televised games (FOX, ESPN, TBS, etc.) are not viewable on MLB TV.


Untracked Games:

  • I watched a few nationally televised games, including the MLB All-Star Game and the "Field of Dreams" game, which were not available through MLB TV.
  • I attended games in Miami and Tampa Bay and watched them with my own, actual eyeballs, without the assistance of modern technology. Both home teams won those games, for the record.



Total Number of Games Watched and Cost Per Game:

  • The 2021 MLB season ran from April 1, 2021 through October 3, 2021 - a total of 183 days.
  • A 162-game schedule for all 30 Major League teams equals a total of 4,860 games played - if each single game counts as two "games played" (one game for the home team and one game for the road team).
    • Because of the ridiculous regional blackouts for Rockies and Diamondbacks games that I've mentioned ad nauseum in previous blogs, I would not have been able to watch any of the 324 games played by either of those two teams.
    • As I've done in the past, I'll estimate that there were 30 more games where I might have been interested in watching the opponent of either the Rockies or Diamondbacks.
    • I will be less generous this season and only subtract 4 "games played" for each week of the regular season to account for nationally televised games (one game on Sunday night and one during prime time on any other day of the week). If the regular season was roughly 25 weeks long, that would be a total of 100 nationally blacked-out games.
    • This brings the total number of games played that I would have had access to down to 4,406.
  • I watched a total of 65 baseball games this season, or a total of 130 "games played."
    • Based on the approximate number of 4,406 "games played" that I had access to, I only watched about 2.9% of those games.
  • 4,406 games played, over a course of 183 days, divides out to 26 "games played" (13 individual games) on a given day.
    • In the 2020 season, I estimated that I could hypothetically have watched about two games per day, due to the fact that I'm still working from home. I won't change that number this season.
  • If the season was 183 days long and I could have watched a maximum of two games per day, that's a total of 366 baseball games that I potentially could have watched, if that's all I did every day.
    • I watched a total of 65 games throughout the season, which is 17% of the maximum number of games that I reasonably could have watched.
    • Here is how that percentage has developed since 2018:
      • 2018: 11%
      • 2019: 26%
      • 2020: 29%
      • 2021: 17%
  • Dividing the number of games watched by the amount I paid for this year's subscription, I spent about $1.83 per game, 14 cents less than last season, and my lowest cost per game since I started tracking all this nonsense.
    • For reference, here is how my cost-per-game ratio has shaped up over the years:
      • 2018: $2.85/game
      • 2019: $1.85/game
      • 2020: $1.97/game
      • 2021: $1.83/game

Duration of Viewing:

Based on the definitions previously listed, here's how long I watched the 65 games, listed in order of frequency:
  • Full: 25 games (28.5%)
  • Partial: 21 games (32.3%)
  • Most: 15 games (23.1%)
  • Minimal: 4 games (6.2%)


Times Watched (Total, Out of 130 Total Teams Watched):

For the first time, I think, since I became a subscriber to MLB TV, I watched every team in the league, other than Arizona and Colorado. Here's how many times I saw those 28 teams in action, regardless of the broadcast I watched:
  1. Texas Rangers: 14
  2. Washington Nationals: 12
  3. Cincinnati Reds: 9
    Tampa Bay Rays: 9
  4. Philadelphia Phillies: 7
    Pittsburgh Pirates: 7
  5. Detroit Tigers: 6
    Los Angeles Dodgers: 6
    Seattle Mariners: 6
  6. Cleveland Indians: 5
    Los Angeles Angels: 5
    Miami Marlins: 5
    Minnesota Twins: 5
  7. Atlanta Braves: 3
    Baltimore Orioles: 3
    Boston Red Sox: 3
    New York Yankees: 3
    Oakland A's: 3
    Toronto Blue Jays: 3
  8. Houston Astros: 2
    Kansas City Royals: 2
    Milwaukee Brewers: 2
    New York Mets: 2
    San Diego Padres: 2
    San Francisco Giants: 2
    St. Louis Cardinals: 2
  9. Chicago Cubs: 1
    Chicago White Sox: 1

Times Watched on the Team's Local Broadcast (Out of 65 Games Watched):

Here's how often I intentionally tuned in to watch a specific team on their local broadcast:
  1. Texas Rangers: 14
  2. Washington Nationals: 12
  3. Cincinnati Reds: 9
  4. Tampa Bay Rays: 6
  5. Miami Marlins: 4
    Seattle Mariners: 4
  6. Cleveland Indians: 3
    Los Angeles Dodgers: 3
  7. Los Angeles Angels: 2
    St. Louis Cardinals: 2
  8. Baltimore Orioles: 1
    Detroit Tigers: 1
    Kansas City Royals: 1
    New York Mets: 1
    Pittsburgh Pirates: 1
    San Diego Padres: 1

Overall W/L Record:

  • The teams whose local broadcasts I watched in the 2021 season went 32-33 (.492). Although that percentage is a bit better than last year, I'm still not making the playoffs with a sub-.500 record
  • Running W/L percentage tracker:
    • 2018: .534
    • 2019: .625
    • 2020: .410
    • 2021: .492

Home/Road Split:

Editor's note: For some reason, I had a very difficult time calculating this next part.
  • Of the 65 games I watched, the team I tuned in to watch played 35 home games (53.8%) and 30 games on the road (46.2%).
  • When I watched a team's home broadcast, those teams went 17-18 (.485).
  • When I watched a team's road broadcast, the teams went 15-15 (.500).


W/L Records for Every Team Watched, Regardless of Broadcast:

  1. Atlanta Braves: 3-0 (1.000)
    Kansas City Royals: 2-0 (1.000)
    San Diego Padres: 2-0 (1.000)
    San Francisco Giants: 2-0 (1.000)
    St. Louis Cardinals: 2-0 (1.000)
    Chicago White Sox: 1-0 (1.000)
  2. Los Angeles Dodgers: 5-1 (.833)
  3. Cincinnati Reds: 7-2 (.777)
  4. Tampa Bay Rays: 6-3 (.666)
    Boston Red Sox: 2-1 (.666)
    New York Yankees: 2-1 (.666)
    Toronto Blue Jays: 2-1 (.666)
  5. Los Angeles Angels: 3-2 (.600)
  6. Detroit Tigers: 3-3 (.500)
    Houston Astros: 1-1 (.500)
    Milwaukee Brewers: 1-1 (.500)
    New York Mets: 1-1 (.500)
  7. Washington Nationals: 5-7 (.416)
  8. Cleveland Indians: 2-3 (.400)
    Miami Marlins: 2-3 (.400)
    Minnesota Twins: 2-3 (.400)
  9. Seattle Mariners: 2-4 (.333)
    Baltimore Orioles: 1-2 (.333)
  10. Philadelphia Phillies: 2-5 (.286)
  11. Texas Rangers: 3-11 (.214)
  12. Pittsburgh Pirates: 1-6 (.143)
  13. Chicago Cubs: 0-1 (.000)
    Oakland A's: 0-3 (.000)

W/L Records for Teams Whose Broadcast I Watched:

  1. St. Louis Cardinals: 2-0 (1.000)
    Baltimore Orioles: 1-0 (1.000)
    Kansas City Royals: 1-0 (1.000)
    New York Mets: 1-0 (1.000)
    Pittsburgh Pirates: 1-0 (1.000)
    San Diego Padres: 1-0 (1.000)
  2. Cincinnati Reds: 7-2 (.777)
  3. Cleveland Indians: 2-1 (.666)
    Los Angeles Dodgers: 2-1 (.666)
  4. Tampa Bay Rays: 3-3 (.500)
    Miami Marlins: 2-2 (.500)
  5. Washington Nationals: 5-7 (.416)
  6. Seattle Mariners: 1-3 (.250)
  7. Texas Rangers: 3-11 (.214)
  8. Detroit Tigers: 0-1 (.000)
    Los Angeles Angels: 0-2 (.000)

Fun or Otherwise Noteworthy Things that Happened When I Watched:

  • I watched two games on Opening Day. In the first, Miguel Cabrera hit his 350th career home run - in the snow. In the other, the Rangers and Royals both scored five runs in the first inning.
  • I watched the first Texas Rangers game at Globe Life Park to allow fans inside. The Rangers played in the stadium last year, without fans, and fans were allowed to attend playoff games there last year, but the Rangers finally got their long-awaited homecoming.
  • I saw a controversial walk-off hit-by-pitch, in which Michael Conforto of the Mets leaned into a pitch in the strike zone with the bases loaded.
  • I watched a game on Jackie Robinson Day, Father's Day, Canada Day and "Joe Morgan Day" in Cincinnati.
  • I saw Vlad Guerrero Jr. hit three home runs in a game, including a grand slam.
  • I watched the bottom of the 9th inning as the Orioles finished off their franchise's first no-hitter in 30 years. I also watched the final inning and a half of Wade Miley's no-hitter. There were a lot of no-hitters this year, so I figured I should probably tune in to see how a couple of them ended.
  • I saw the Reds blow a five-run 8th inning lead, then come back to win by three in the 9th.
  • I watched Max Scherzer blow an 8-0 Nationals lead, punctuated by Mad Max giving up a grand slam to a relief pitcher. The Padres won on a walk-off in the 9th inning. It was painful.
  • I watched several MLB debuts - most notably, Wander Franco's highly anticipated call-up for Tampa Bay.
  • I watched a Miami Marlins game that my parents attended.
  • Death, taxes and the Rangers losing on a walk-off grand slam. It happened again this year, and I witnessed it.
  • I thought I'd try to be the typical bad luck charm I've developed into by spoiling the Cardinals' monstrous winning streak at the end of the season, but alas, they ended up winning their 17th straight game. They were hot, at the time.
  • Unfortunately, I saw the Yankees clinch a spot in the AL Wild Card race. Despite all of the wild scenarios, including a potential four-way tie (NYY, BOS, TOR, SEA), the least fun thing ended up happening, and the Yankees ended up playing the Red Sox in the Wild Card Game.
  • I tuned in for six consecutive losses, late in the season, and that many losses in a row are not very fun to sit through.


Final Thoughts:

Another baseball season has come and gone. In the end, I have determined that the teams I like most were really, really bad this year. I try not to cherry-pick the games I watch, so I don't intentionally tune into games where the outcome is all but determined, but man, my teams were terrible in 2021.

Baseball is a great sport. I really do love it, and it's been so nice to just be able to turn a game on in the background while I work. There were many days and weeks when I'd open up the ESPN app to see if there were any day games coming up, and it was a joy when there were a few games that I could tune into. I've now been to 16 Major League Baseball stadiums. This year's adventures took me out to Florida, so it was exciting to watch a handful of Rays and Marlins games, before and after my trip.

I sometimes wonder whether I should keep subscribing to MLB TV. Looking at these stats, where it's like... Geez, I watched the Rangers 14 times and they only won three games... that makes it tough. But hey, despite another year of sub-.500 watching, the stats show that I did get the best value out of my MLB TV subscription, at least as long as I've been keeping track of all this nonsense.

If any of you dared read this blog, first of all, I truly commend you for pitying me so much. Second of all, thanks for reading. If nothing else, this blog justified me opening my phone and logging a few metrics at the end of the final out.

Farewell.

THE END

Tuesday, September 21, 2021

FanX 21: LEGO Master Zack Macasaet interview


So there I was, minding my own business, making my way across the vendor floor at FanX Salt Lake Comic Convention 2021, in search of  pop culture LEGOs. I headed back to a booth I'd visited earlier in the day. Then, to my great surprise, just 24 hours after having finished "LEGO Masters" Season 2, I noticed several contestants from the TV show! I immediately recognized Caleb Schilling, and soon thereafter spotted several other familiar faces. This, honestly, was one of the most pleasant surprises of the entire weekend for me. I'm a reality TV junkie, and bumping into some people that I had literally just barely watched on Hulu got me really excited.

I strolled on over and began chatting with Zack Macasaet - a finalist from his season, who made it all the way to the end with his brother, Wayne. Here's some of what we discussed:


Signs of the Times: All right, so… Surprise! The LEGO Masters are here! First of all, tell me about the show. What was it like being on the show?


Zack Macasaet: It was a lot of pressure, trying to build under the clock. Coming in, there was a lot of uncertainty, whether or not were even going to be on the show! And then we didn’t even know if we were going to get knocked out in the first round or not. So me and my brother came out, flying like dragons…


SotT: That’s right!


ZM: And by the end of it, we pulled ourselves through to the finale! I don’t want to spoil it for anybody, but… Gotta watch the finale!


SotT: Did you have a build that was your favorite, out of the whole competition?


ZM: A build that was my favorite? The dragons. My brother’s would be the whale. People liked the hat, the pigs were awesome, the castle build at the end – near the end, where we’re stretching out six feet… a lot of great, awesome stuff.


SotT: That’s good. That’s good. What advice would you give to people who like LEGOs but want to take it, maybe, to the next level?


ZM: Oh, ok… My brother would say, “Build what you want.” That’s what my brother would say. For me, I’d say it’s all about trial and error. You just keep collecting your LEGO bricks, you put it together and come up with new things. And every idea is a good idea.


SotT: Cool. Cool, all right. Have you been to Utah before?


ZM: First time!


SotT: First time? All right! Quick trip for you, though.


ZM: Yeah, quick trip for me. I’m only here for… [I’ve been here] about three days. I was here for the finale, watching it with all the other LEGO Masters over here – we even have another finalist over here: Caleb. So you’ve got to get an interview with him, too.


SotT: Yeah, I’ve got to go talk to him, too!


ZM: Oh, yeah!


Update: I talked to Caleb, too, and a few others, as well, but didn't have time to do any more interviews.

Check out Zack's YouTube channel by clicking here.






Monday, September 20, 2021

FanX 2021: Rob Paulsen on the importance of fun and educational cartoons

 


The following interview took place during the opening press conference for FanX Salt Lake Comic Convention 2021:


Signs of the Times: Hello! Thanks for coming back, first of all. My name’s Aaron. I work with the FanX social media team. A lot of things have happened in the past two years since we had a convention – I got married and had a kid.


Jess Harnell: Good for you!


Jim Cummings and Rob Paulsen, in background: Woo hoo!


SotT: Having a child and working from home, I watch a lot of TV, but my choices in entertainment have changed quite a bit. So, my question for you guys is: what is the importance in making – I guess, producing – content that is both fun and educational? … I remember, growing up, watching “Animaniacs” and other shows. I learned a lot, and I still remember some of your songs, you know?


JH: Oh, great!


SotT: So, what is the importance for you making things that are fun and educational for kids?


JH: Rob, do you want to take that?


RP: Why is it important? I think you’ve already touched on it. The fact is that you’re now willing to share this with your children because it has enough subversive humor to entertain you, and I would submit you probably got jokes down the road from “Animaniacs” that you didn’t get when you first watched when you were a little guy.


JH: You won’t believe what’s coming.


RP: That was, as Mo [LaMarche] and everyone has said [earlier in the press conference], that is utterly by design – and not just on “Animaniacs” and “Pinky and the Brain.” I think that there are other shows that strive to do that, as well. But also, we have a big orchestra, we get to do great music – a lot of them are “earwigs.” I can sing, “Tunisia, Morocco, Uganda, Angola, Zimbabwe, Djibouti, Botswana…” a capella, and it doesn’t matter. It’s such a remarkable tune that Randy Rogel wrote.


JH: And he does it live, too, all the time.


JC: I can feel him stopping himself. [laughter] Must… not… sing… full… song!




RP:
Can I give you my own anecdotal evidence? My son is now 37, surprisingly. When my son was little, he lived for "The Muppets." I could watch "Muppets" all day.


JH: Yeah.


RP: I loved it. If my kid wanted to watch “Teletubbies,” I would have had a real problem.


JH: Oh, yeah!


RP: …Not with my child – and I understand why the rudimentary nature of “Teletubbies” and “Barney”… I understand why they work. But if I’m, in some respects, doomed to watch television with my kid, I could watch Big Bird all day. My kid can learn stuff – he can learn how to be kind and generous and count and all of that, without [me] thinking, “There’s not enough wine in the world for me!”


JC: And his youngest is 25, so it’s hard for [Rob] to… still learning stuff.


RP: Still learning!


JC: It’s tough!


RP: So, you’ve kind of answered your question for us because you’re the example, and thank you for that.


SotT: No, thank you!


JH: The one thing I’ll add is: I’ve always said that “Animaniacs,” in particular, is a Trojan horse because it’s an educational social satire masquerading as a kids’ show. That’s what it is.

Wednesday, August 11, 2021

Ranking the Jeopardy! Guest Hosts

 


When the news broke that Alex Trebek passed away in 2020, I started watching a lot of "Jeopardy!" And when I say "a lot of 'Jeopardy!'," I mean that I watched a ton of "Jeopardy!"

As a work-from-home, first-time father, I spend a lot of time on the couch, so I just started watching as much of it as I could. I started recording the syndicated episodes so I could catch the tail end of Alex's 37-year run, I watched literally every single episode that was on Netflix at the time and I even read Mr. Trebek's 2020 autobiography, The Answer Is....

My enthusiasm for the show didn't wane when the show announced an upcoming schedule of celebrity guest hosts - perhaps to find a permanent replacement for the late, great Alex Trebek. I was intrigued to find out how these guests would perform and anxious to find out who they'd ultimately pick as a successor. Needless to say, I feel qualified to write this blog because I've watched nearly every single episode with a guest host, other than a couple shows that didn't record, due to weird glitches with my DVR.

If you've got nothing else going on and need something to read, I'll share my knowledge with you and then we can compare notes if you're still with me at the end.


Early Expectations

My early money was on legendary "Jeopardy!" champion Ken Jennings - who I interviewed for the Deseret News in 2014 - but a few other names stood out, like longtime news anchor (and iconic Early 2000s reality TV show host) Anderson Cooper, piqued my interest.

One notable omission from the first guest host list was LeVar Burton, who has for some time been an Internet darling for Alex Trebek's ultimate replacement. Burton was kind of the television voice of my childhood education, as host of "Reading Rainbow," and I met him back at a Salt Lake Comic Convention a few years back, so I thought he'd do a great job, if given the chance.

The Internet did what it does and campaigned to get Burton a "Jeopardy!" hosting gig; an online petition at change.org garnered (at the time of writing this post) digital signatures of 267,377 people who wanted Burton to become the permanent host. In addition, Burton himself actively campaigned for the job on Twitter. Here's one of his tweets:



Eventually, Burton, along with several others, were tacked onto the list of guest hosts, for a total of 16 stand-ins. It was time to usher in a new era for one of America's favorite game shows.


A Brief Breakdown of the Guest Hosts

Ken Jennings had, arguably, the toughest job of all: being the first to step into the gigantic footprints left by the beloved Alex Trebek. But as a familiar face who has spent more time on that stage than any other contestant in the history of the show, he fit in seamlessly. His familiarity with the game was evident, his pacing was perfect and, although he wasn't Alex, he felt like the next best thing. Jennings remained at the podium for six weeks - three times more than any other guest host.

Replacing Jennings was the executive producer of "Jeopardy!," Mike Richards. I'd never heard of the guy, but he ended up being a great moderator, as well. He was fast-paced, friendly and interesting enough that I Googled him to learn more about him. At the time, I thought he'd also be good as a full-time host, but thought I'd reserve my final judgment until I'd seen more guest hosts.

Not all of the celebrities were a home run, though. The next two guest hosts were Katie Couric and Dr. Oz, and I didn't particularly care for either of them. Couric came off as an annoying mom trying to be cool (I still remember her referring to the contestants as "you little braniacs," and that just drove me absolutely nuts), and Dr. Oz had a great "game show host" voice but reportedly rubbed people the wrong way while he was there.

The immediate celebrity frontrunner, according to Twitter, was current NFL quarterback Aaron Rodgers - a Celebrity Jeopardy! champion with an unapologetic love of the show. First of all, there is no chance on the good, green Earth that Aaron Rodgers is quitting his day job to host a game show. Not a chance in the world. I'll give it to him, though. Rodgers actually ended up doing a good job. His presentation was rather slow and occasionally awkward. Basically, he came off as a guy who wasn't used to hosting trivia contests. But he was humorous and truly seemed to be enjoying himself, so I forgave him.

A handful of news anchors and reporters filled in, as well. I'm not familiar enough with news and politics to understand whether I'm supposed to hate these people, based on my personal beliefs or whatever, so I went in unbiased. Here's a quick breakdown of what I thought of them:

  • I will always love Anderson Cooper because of the classic reality TV show "The Mole" (Netflix just added the first two seasons of, by the way!). He was a solid host, though a bit stiff at times. He eventually lightened up a little bit, which was good to see.
  • I had no idea who Bill Whitaker was when he stepped onto the stage. Turns out he's on "60 Minutes." Although he didn't strike me as full-time-host caliber, his voice was extremely soothing and he just seemed like the nicest old grandpa or neighbor you could ever want. I really enjoyed his time on the show.
  • Savannah Guthrie from "NBC TODAY"... or as I like to call her, "Katie Couric, Jr." Not unlike Couric, I didn't particularly like Guthrie as guest host. She seemed happy to be there but I would have a hard time tuning in to watch her night after night.
  • I have something to say about most of the guest hosts, either good or bad. Such was not the case for George Stephanopolous ("Good Morning America"). I can't remember practically anything about his time on the show.
  • Also from the ranks of "Good Morning America" was Robin Roberts, who I was somewhat familiar with from her work on ESPN. I thought she did a good job on "Jeopardy!" She was enthusiastic (sometimes a bit too enthusiastic, maybe) and undeniably likable during her one-week stint.
  • The penultimate guest host was CNBC's David Faber - a "Celebrity Jeopardy!" champion in his own right! I was a bit behind when he took over but had seen people online saying that he was great. After wrapping up his episodes earlier today, I have to agree! He was fast-paced and not a distracting presence. I think he would make a very good host.
At the time I wrote this blog, sportscaster Joe Buck was serving as the final of the 16 guest hosts. I know that a lot of sports fans get irritated by him, but I don't mind him doing sports commentary and I have been liking him on "Jeopardy!" so far, too. He's clearly having a good time, and I always appreciate when Alex and others have found ways to inject humor and personality into the game without derailing the competition.

Two guest hosts that I was really pleased with were Miyam Bialik and Dr. Sanjay Gupta. I know that there are some aspects of Bialik's personal life that are a bit... odd.. but my favorite actor is Tom Cruise, so who am I to judge? She is essentially a real-life genius, so she knows her stuff, and she commanded the game well, unlike several other hosts. I knew nothing of Gupta's life or credits, despite his name sounding vaguely familiar, but he also came off as very well educated and unafraid of the big stage. His attempt to do The Sprinkler remains a top highlight of the Guest Host Era. I tried to find a GIF of it but failed.

There were two guest hosts that I thought let excitement and expectations get the best of them: former "Jeopardy! Tournament of Champions" winner Buzzy Cohen and our old pal, LeVar Burton. Buzzy, whose real name is not "Buzzy" and who literally mentioned to Alex Trebek during his tournament run that his dream was to replace him as host, seemed tickled pink to have a crack at running the show, but his pacing was sporadic and his enthusiasm seemed to get in the way of the game from time to time. I mean, he wasn't bad, but a little Buzzy goes a long way. We'll get to LeVar in just a second.

Last week, a report surfaced, saying that Mike Richards was in "advanced negotiations" to become the permanent host of "Jeopardy!" As you might imagine, the Internet was NOT HAPPY about this news, for a couple different reasons - particularly because LeVar Burton had not been selected. We live in a society where people love to get outraged about things, simply for the sake of it, and I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the people who were reportedly furious that LeVar Burton probably wasn't going to be the permanent host don't watch "Jeopardy!" and/or didn't see LeVar Burton as guest host. I'm happy to walk that one back if somebody can prove me wrong, but that's the assumption I'm going to make.

My man LeVar put himself in a really tough spot by campaigning so hard for the job. I'd say that the bar was set higher for him than it was for anyone else, other than maybe Ken Jennings - but he did it to himself. So how'd he do?

He was stiff. He was awkward. He was slow. He randomly shouted the verdict of contestants' responses a couple times. Once, he accidentally told someone he got a question wrong, then had to correct himself immediately. He had long, awkward pauses a couple times, including during Final Jeopardy! on his last show. It was really rough, honestly. He's a super nice guy and I wished him nothing but the best for this gig, but it was not good. If you're going to get upset about something in the comments section of a post today, the "LeVar Burton Must Replace Alex Trebek" hill is definitely not the one you want to die on. He wasn't the best guest host. Not by a long shot. And it's too bad. He set himself up to win and didn't even come close.

The Official Announcement

Earlier today, "Jeopardy!" announced their official decision. In an unprecedented move, the show has decided to move forward with not one but two permanent hosts: Mike Richards and Miyam Bialik. Richards will handle the day-to-day, syndicated programming, and Bialik will appear on all "spin-offs," such as prime-time events and tournaments.

Personally, I love this move. I had Richards and Bialik ranked very high on my list, which we'll get to in a moment, and I think they'll do as good a job as anyone.

I know that this decision is causing a lot of dissention among fans (or, as explained previously, people who claim to watch simply as an excuse to argue). People are still pissed that it's not LeVar Burton, but he wasn't good enough. Even if you're the most qualified person in the universe, if you go in and bomb the interview, sometimes you don't get chosen. That's life, bruv. I'm not going to beat that dead horse any further.

People have got issues with the lack of diversity in televised trivia. I saw one random person complaining on Twitter that "Jeopardy!" had a perfectly diverse candidate in LeVar Burton and were opting to go with "a generic white guy" instead. Don't tell anyone I said that, but... isn't that racist? "We shouldn't choose this person because they're a white man." Am I wrong? I say you hire the best person for the job, regardless of gender, race or any other factor. But hey, what do I know?

I was fine with the rumor that it was just going to be Mike Richards because I thought he performed really well "in the interview," so to speak. The fact that we're getting two of my top candidates is awesome news, in my opinion.

Guest Host Power Rankings

As of this exact moment in time, Joe Buck currently still has two episodes left in his stay, so the final section of this blog is subject (but unlikely) to change. I was planning on saving this blog until the weekend, once the Guest Host Era was over, but when the big announcement dropping this afternoon, I needed to fast-track the post.

With no further ado and with no more gilding the lily, here is how I ranked the "Jeopardy!" guest hosts, from first to worst:

1. Ken Jennings


2. Mike Richards

3. Mayim Bialik

4. Sanjay Gupta

5. David Faber

6. Aaron Rodgers

7. Joe Buck

8. Robin Roberts

9. Anderson Cooper

10. LeVar Burton

11. Bill Whitaker

12. Buzzy Cohen

13. Savannah Guthrie

14. Dr. Oz

15. Katie Couric

16. George Stephanopoulos


How'd I Do?

If you're a TV trivia junkie like me, feel free to let me know if I got the list right. Leave me a comment if you think I got it wrong. You can tweet me (here and here). You can text me. You can look me up on the ol' Facebook, if you truly desire.

But do me a favor and just phrase your feedback in the form of a question.

Until next time.

Tuesday, June 22, 2021

The Bitter Pill 4: Another Playoff Choke

It's a well-documented fact that I am cursed as a sports fan. Cursed as a human, really, because I discovered at a very young age that I like sports. And sports end in disappointment 99 percent of the time. In my 34 years of life, sports teams for which I have an active rooting interest have won championships two times:


Oh, and then there was Real Salt Lake, which won the Major League Soccer Cup in 2009, and although that's my local soccer team, I wouldn't classify myself as an actual fan because I rarely watch them play.

The University of Utah beat Alabama in the 2009 Sugar Bowl, but I didn't start attending The U until that fall, so I wasn't technically a student at that point.

I became a fan of the Texas Rangers the year after they lost in two consecutive World Series, and they haven't come close to making it back any time since then, 10 years ago. However, Rougned Odor landed a really solid punch on Jose Bautista in 2016, which was cool.

I stopped cheering for the Chicago Cubs after following them for my entire childhood about two or three years before they finally won a World Series. It got to a point when I just couldn't handle all the losing anymore.

Of course, there are my beloved Utah Jazz, which lost to Michael Jordan's Chicago Bulls in back-to-back NBA championships, but that's another story for another time.

"This Could Be the Year"

This year, I really thought the Jazz had a chance to go all the way. I really, truly did. There was a stretch of the season where we won, like, 23 straight home games, I think, and we were just blowing fools out by 20 points every night. It was so much fun to watch. Honestly, if the Jazz didn't go up by 20 at some point in the game, it was almost disappointing to me. I remember that there was a point in time - I think it was February 25 or something? - where I actually had the thought, "This could be the year."

Yikes. For the first time in my life, I actually thought those words.

But can you blame me? The Jazz were the best team in the National Basketball Association for nearly the entire 2020-21 season, finishing with the outright best record in the league for the first time in franchise history. This earned them the #1 seed for the playoffs and home court advantage throughout.

There was some speculation and discussion about whether the Jazz would keep playing hard through the end of the season to clinch that top seed - and whether they even should. It sometimes becomes a controversial strategy for teams to "tank" (intentionally lose games) to position themselves in a favorable postseason matchup, sometimes to the ire of basketball fans. Such was not the case for this year's Utah Jazz; I was proud to see that we kept fighting to the very end, securing the best record by a half game over the Phoenix Suns.

I thought, if nothing else, we could hang our proverbial hat on the fact that we were, statistically, the best team in the league this year. We played really well all season - despite nagging injuries to several key players - had three All-Stars for the first time since the 1980s, and ultimately had a Coach of the Year finalist in Quin Snyder; two finalists for Sixth Man of the Year, Joe Ingles and eventual winner Jordan Clarkson; and the now-three-time Defensive Player of the Year, Rudy Gobert. Without a doubt, this regular season was one for the record books. And it felt good. Really good.


The Injury Bug Strikes... But Would it Even Matter?

One of the few major concerns, heading into the playoffs, were injuries to the Jazz's two most important offensive players: Donovan Mitchell, who missed the last 16 games of the regular season due to ankle pain; and Mike Conley, whose recurring hamstring soreness kept him in and out of action throughout some stretches of the regular season and forced him to miss Game 1 of the first round, against his former team, the Memphis Grizzlies.

The Jazz would go on to lose Game 1 against Memphis, at home, which was quite disconcerting. In my mind, Memphis was a great matchup for the Jazz; we beat them three times in a six-day span during the regular season (no exaggeration), but my prediction of a four-game sweep in the first round did not come to pass..

But Conley returned for Game 2, and the Jazz beat Memphis four straight times, eliminating the Grizzlies in five games. Because that matchup ended earlier than other Western Conference series, the Jazz were forced to wait six days for the winner of the Clippers-Mavericks series. Ultimately, the nationally acclaimed Los Angeles Clippers moved on, which didn't scare me at all. The talking heads on sports radio love teams from big markets like L.A. and always favor them in the postseason, so their words meant nothing to me.

Unlike the Jazz, the Clippers tanked their final few games of the regular season - most likely to avoid having to play their rivals, the Lakers, in the first round - and it took them a full seven-game series to squeak past the Dallas. Well, the Jazz were clearly a better team than the Mavericks in the regular season, so I figured the Jazz would win the second round series convincingly, in five or six games, and move on to the Western Conference Finals for the first time since 2009.

Meanwhile, LeBron James' Los Angeles Clippers got ousted in the first round by the 2-seed Phoenix Suns, which was hilarious, and the Golden State Warriors didn't even make the playoffs this season, so things were looking really good for the Jazz. Certainly, a Utah/Phoenix showdown in the Western Conference Finals was imminent.

The Jazz won the first two games against the Clippers, thanks to some incredible offensive performances by Donovan Mitchell and a Game 1-winning block by Rudy Gobert. What was better? The Jazz had done it without Mike Conley even lacing up his high-tops. The hamstring injury keep him sidelined for the first two games and, thankfully, it didn't hurt us. I did get a bit concerned, though, when Paul George collided with Donovan with seven seconds left in a game that was already out of reach for the Clippers. The game was all but over, yet there was our superstar, writing on the ground in pain. Donovan went down hard and looked like his ankle was really bothering him. However, he'd have a couple days to rest up and we'd be all right. Tired bodies notwithstanding, we were up 2-0 and things were looking good.


With injuries piling up for the remaining teams around the league, if we could just get our guys back up to full strength, we'd have an amazing chance at making a run to the Finals, and our best shot, arguably, ever to actually win it. "Rest up, boys," I pleaded, "and take care of business."


There Was No Way the Clippers Would Beat Us... Right??

Two games in, I was very excited. All I wanted was a split of the next two games in Los Angeles, and the Jazz would finish it off in five games, I told myself. There was no way the Clippers would beat this Jazz team four times out of the next five games. Not a chance.

The series shifted to Hollywood, and the Jazz got thumped in Game 3. It was ok, I thought. In fact, I wasn't even stressed at all! Just win Game 4 and bring it back home to close it out. Easy.

Game 4 was ugly. Conley remained out due to injury, and the Jazz just couldn't figure it out. The series came back to Utah, tied 2-2. The Jazz came out on fire in the first half. Bojan Bogdonavic seemingly could not miss. The Jazz shot upwards of 60 percent from the field in the first 24 minutes. But we went into halftime with a measly five-point lead. Shooting the way we did, you would have thought we'd be up by double digits, at least. Coming back out in the second half, it was like we forgot how to put the ball in the hoop. The Clippers kept pouring on the offense and the Jazz couldn't get any stops. We lost Game 5 in front of our notoriously loud home crowd and would have to head back to California for Game 6 with our backs against the wall.

Spoiler: Game 6 was very similar to Game 5. The Jazz came out blistering hot. I even tweeted, "The Jazz are not messing around." We built a 25-point lead at one point. It was glorious. "Stomp the throat," I texted my family. Just keep the pedal to the metal and bring it back home for Game 7. In the second half, however, the Jazz made some very interesting defensive decisions. And when I say that, I mean that we, for some dang reason, chose to let a Clippers player stand wide open in the corner on every single play. It's ok to do that sometimes if the guy you're leaving open can't shoot. But guess what? The Clippers COULD. NOT. MISS. They should have called me up and put me in because I totally would have stood in that corner with my hands up. That's more than anybody on the court was doing!

The villain this time around was not Michael Jordan. It wasn't even Denver Nuggets stars Jamal Murray or Nikola Jokic, like it was last season WHEN THE JAZZ BLEW A 3-1 LEAD. I DIDN'T EVEN BLOG ABOUT THAT ONE! No, no. It was some dude named Terance Mann. Like, I honestly didn't even know who this guy was a couple weeks ago. But we left him open time and time and time and time and time again and he lit us up for a career high 39 points. That's more points than he ever even scored in a college game. Now, the Jazz are notorious for letting random no-name players get career highs, but in an elimination game with our season - and possibly an NBA championship - on the line?!? Terance Mann?? He only missed six shots in the entire game, and he was shooting a lot. That's an incredible night, no matter who you are. And we let him absolutely wreck us.

Needless to say, the Jazz lost their fourth straight game to these Clippers -- a game in which their best player, Kawhi Leonard, did not even play, mind you! -- and we got bounced from the playoffs.

Let this sink in: we played our butts off in the regular season got beaten in the second round by a team that tanked, heading into the playoffs. Ugh. So dumb.

Also frustrating: we were back, somewhat, at full strength for Game 6, in the sense that Mike and Donovan were both playing, but you could tell that Mike was kind of just going through the motions (bless him for even trying), and Donovan looked like he was maybe 70 or 80 percent healthy at best for the final two or three games of the series.

And we lost to a team led by freaking Paul George (who will go down as the second most overrated first-ballot Hall of Famer of all time, next to Tracy McGrady) and some dude named Terance Mann, who won't even be in the league anymore in three years. Mark my words on that one. Why. Why does this happen.

Editor's note: Terance Mann had a whopping 9 points in Game 1 of the Western Conference Finals.

I was basically furious, but I held it together because this is just the kind of thing that the Jazz do, every single year. I even predicted it on two separate occasions, earlier that day. "Double-digit Jazz loss." I knew it was going to happen, and then it did.


Oh, What Could Have Been...

Of all the years for us to choke, why did it have to be this year? No LeBron, no Steph Curry, home court advantage all the way... This was our year! After all the bull crap we had to go through when Rudy Gobert tested positive for COVID-19 last season, resulting in the complete shut-down of sports in North America... In a year where a flock of birds hit the team's charter plane and caused them to make an emergency landing... In a year where LeBron and Kevin Durant openly mocked the Utah Jazz during the selection of All-Star teams... Man, there should have been such an incredible "30 For 30" documentary about this team. "The Team of Destiny," they would have called us. The team that defied all odds and all the hate and disbelief from the national media. That should have been us. That should have been this year. The path was practically paved in gold.

Phoenix would have been tough, but the league ruled Chris Paul out for (so far) at least Game 1 of the Western Conference Finals for COVID-19 health and safety protocols, and the Suns without CP3 did not worry me. The only two teams I really didn't want to face late in the playoffs were Philadelphia and Brooklyn, both of which were eliminated in the Eastern Conference within days of the Jazz losing. If we could have made it to the championship, we would have gone up against either Milwaukee or Atlanta (the two teams currently facing off in the Eastern Conference Finals). Man, that would have been perfect. Could have been Jazz in five. Sickening. Soul-shattering for lifelong fans like me.

It's just so frustrating to spend all season watching the games - and I try not to miss many games, if we're playing well, which we were! - and to pour in countless hours of my attention, then have them rip my stupid heart out and stomp on it over and over again.

Why didn't the Jazz make the appropriate defensive adjustments in the second half of those second-round games? How could they play so well in the first two quarters, then just abruptly stop making threes? Why couldn't the injuries to our star players have come at the beginning of the season, not at the end of it? Couldn't we channel that mid-season magic one more time and run a string of eight or 10 consecutive home victories? Is any of that too much to ask?

Pain. It's just... pain.

As my friend Scott Aylett and I discussed after the abrupt end to the Jazz's season, there are a million things that would be more satisfying than to get emotionally invested in sports ever again. We could stare at the wall and watch paint dry. We could go kick some dirt around for 15 minutes, which could possibly provide some unexpected joy. There are movies and TV shows and video games and books out there that will give a tremendous amount more satisfaction in a two-hour span than can ever be felt at the end of a basketball season.

Why was I cursed to be this way? Why must I continue to follow sports, year after year? How could I be so foolish?

It sucks to think it, but maybe it's true: if the Jazz couldn't get it done this year, with everything we had going for us, maybe it's never going to happen at all.

Yet, will I keep watching? Of course. What kind of a stupid question is that?


Death, Taxes and Eternal Sadness

I used to joke that 80 percent of the sadness in my life came from being a sports fan, and the other 20 percent came from women, but I'm married now, which means that sports account for all of the sadness I experience, and that's a straight-up fact. It's a painful, painful life that I've chosen.

All I can hope now is that I am reincarnated as a non-sports fan in my next life. Or as a monkey. That might be kind of exciting, too.

*****

Related Blogs:

If, for some sick and twisted reason, you kept reading until the end of this blog and thought it was funny and/or entertaining, first of all, how dare you take joy in my pain? Second of all, you might find these other blogs interesting: