Pages

Tuesday, November 12, 2019

The Mandalorian Recap: S1E1 - Chapter One


Unless you've been living under a rock somewhere, you know that Disney+ launched today, on November 12, 2019. Years from now, we, as a society, may look back on this day as a landmark moment for popular culture. Truly, if executed as it should be, Disney's brand new streaming service will be life-changing. For the first time ever, most of Disney's movie and television library can be found under the same roof. Animated classics - even those that have been "locked in the Disney Vault" for years - Pixar movies, Disney Channel originals, Marvel, Star Wars and Disney+ originals are all available with the click of a button. It's going to be great.

One of the most highly touted original series to premiere on Launch Day is a weekly, episodic installment of Star Wars content called "The MandalorianThe Mandalorian." As described on IMDb, the series chronicles "the travails of a lone gunfighter in the outer reaches of the galaxy, far from the authority of the New Republic."

Be warned: from this point on - and, I hope, weekly, after each episode, I'm going to break down what happens in the show, including FULL SPOILERS. If you haven't watched Episode 1 of "The Mandalorian," now would be a great time to stop reading. (But come back later, please, and discuss with me after you've watched!)


So what is "The Mandalorian"?

"The Mandalorian" will be based on the adventures of a yet-to-be-named bounty hunter. At this point, we honestly don't know much about him. But he is reminiscent of the legendary Star Wars character Boba Fett, and he's apparently very good at what he does. While Episode 1 only lays a little bit of the groundwork for who this guy is and what the series is about, episode previews listed on IMDb (for the first three episodes) seem to indicate that the season will largely revolve around the target acquired at the end of the first show.

If we learned anything about the tone of the series after one episode, it truly feels like a throwback to the O.G. Star Wars. Chronologically, Executive Producer Jon Favreau has stated that "The Mandalorian" takes place five years after the fall of the Empire and the events of "Return of the Jedi." This means that a lot of the characters and set pieces look similar to Episode VI - and that's a good thing. The season premiere does have its fair share of CGI (and, for the most part, it looks really good), but it also incorporates a lot of practical effects, from costumes to creatures and props. It's also nice to see a lot of familiar costumes that look like they walked off of the set of "ROTJ." For a day filled with an over-abundance of Disney nostalgia, this step back into the glory days of George Lucas' original vision was a breath of fresh air.

Who is The Mandalorian?

As far as the character, himself, is concerned, The Mandalorian (who I may periodically start referring to as "TM" for the sake of brevity), looks awesome. He's got great armor, cool weapons and a gorgeous ship. In my mind, he instantly became one of the best-looking characters in the Star Wars universe.

He doesn't talk much. I suppose you could say that TM chooses his words wisely. He's no wise-cracking Marvel character - that's for sure - and, when he does talk, his dialogue seems important.

We learn that he had a troubled childhood. We briefly see glimpses of a child, who we presume was The Mandalorian, running through a pillaged town with his parents, gunshots blasting in every direction. We see a couple images of him being hidden by his father, from which we can deduce that the bounty hunter was raised as an orphan.

I also sensed that TM is inherently kind. At one point, after he is saved from almost certain death, he sincerely thanks a stranger for his help. Behind the rough exterior, it would seem that The Mandalorian is a good person. Time will tell.

Intergalactic fun! - Episode 1 Recap

While some early world of mouth indicated that "The Mandalorian" gets off to a slow start, I dug it from the very beginning. The opening cantina scene (which aired during halftime of last night's Monday Night Football) was a good way to kick things off. It felt like it came from the same vein as the "Han Shot First" scene from Episode IV. The part where that the guy got split in half by the mechanical door was brutal and I loved it.

Upon retrieving his first on-screen bounty, TM hauls the criminal back to his ship. Moments later, a gigantic underwater beast breaks through the ice and attacks the spacecraft. That was a fun moment, introducing the first hint of external danger. Generally, the galaxy is not a safe place. It isn't long before the newly bound prisoner tries to weasel his way to freedom. The Mandalorian puts an end to that unfruitful quest by icing the guy with carbonite - simultaneously linking this series to the iconic moment when Boba Fett dooms Han Solo to a similar fate in the original trilogy.

Carl Weathers (best known for his role as Apollo Creed in the "Rocky" franchise) is introduced as a reluctant creditor who has an exclusive job for The Mandalorian. It's great to see him on the screen again! This leads to TM encountering a group of ex-Empire stormtroopers and a wealthy client (played by veteran actor Werner Herzog). He offers TM a lucrative bounty for a highly valued target. Of course, our man accepts the job and heads out for the task.

Along the way, he is saved by an extra-terrestrial stranger (apparently played by Nick Nolte), who, as previously mentioned, saves The Mandalorian's life, then teaches him how to ride some gnarly fish-beasts to cross the desert planet. Meanwhile, the stranger indicates that this particular region has been a hotbed of mercenary activity as of late, and that all bounty hunters who have passed through have died in their pursuit of treasure.


The Mandalorian reaches his destination at the same time as a robotic bounty hunter who I regret to inform you is not the legendary IG-88. Nope. This one is called IG-11, and he's voiced by "Thor: Ragnarok" director Taika Waititi. I really liked the character design of IG-11. His robotic movements and ability to rotate his arms and body 360 degrees were really cool.

IG-11, we discover, is after the same bounty as The Mandalorian and, after a brief moment of hostility, it agrees to help TM acquire the target for a share of the reward (and all of the reputation credits associated with the capture). The two join forces to take out the hostile bystanders outside the building in question. This was my favorite scene of the episode - great action and a lot of exciting moments. The robot's (manufacturer-installed) propensity to initiate his self-destruct protocol was hysterical, too.

When the coast is finally clear, The Mandalorian and IG-11 make their way inside the building and eliminate the last man standing. TM's tracking beacon indicates that the target is nearby. TM discovers the bounty's precise location, but shows some signs of confusion. He had been informed that the target was 50 years old, but what they had stumbled across did not meet that description. The camera reveals that the target, in fact, is...

It's a little baby Yoda?!

IG-11 insists that the target must be eliminated, but TM refuses and kills the droid, instead. The episode closes with a shot of The Mandalorian reaching out toward the tiny hands of his childlike bounty.


Whoa.

Questions


  • What happened to The Mandalorian as a child?
  • What was the significance of the Beskar steel?
  • Why don't Mandalorians take off their helmets? (They mentioned it several times, after all.)
  • Where did this Yoda baby come from? What does that mean, exactly? Was Yoda not the last of his species?
  • Why do so many people want the Yoda baby dead?
  • At the end of the episode, was the Yoda baby hovering with the Force, or was the pod/cradle doing it? (Great question from Clyde Ratliff!)
  • Will this show affect future movies or the expanded Star Wars universe?


Quotes


  • "Stay off the ice. That's the understatement of the millennium." - The Bounty, after narrowly escaping the ice monster
  • "We have him four to one." "I like those odds." - Stormtroopers, The Mandalorian
  • "Bounty hunting is a complicated profession." - The Client
  • "Anyone else?" - The Mandalorian, after eliminating the last hostile


Qualms


  • Overall, I really liked this episode, so I really don't have any major complaints about it, but the second I saw that big, intimidating Mandalorian at the weapons forge, I knew they would end up being a female. It just seemed like the obvious "Disney" thing to do. I was right.
  • The playback was a little bit choppy for me. I'm unsure whether this was because of my internet connection or because of extremely heavy traffic for the Disney+ servers, as widely reported throughout the day.
  • Also, in the opening cantina scene, there were tons of unnecessary commas in the subtitles. That was quite troublesome to me, as a writer.




Instant Analysis

"I expected it to be good, but it was better than I expected. I didn't anticipate it ending that way at all. I thought we were just gonna have a solid action bounty hunter series. I didn't expect to play with emotions. That baby was adorable."
- Clyde Ratliff

"Episode 1 of The Mandalorian brought great interest in to where this series can go. Brought the Star Wars universe to life with a mix of laughs, action, and suspense."
- DJ Mein

"Having had kept up with additional canonical series like 'Star Wars: The Clone Wars' and 'Star Wars: Rebels' in recent years, it made this show really exhilarating to watch and makes me excited to see what they have in store next."
- Cody Christensen

"There were a couple of fun surprises for true Star Wars fans. This is a promising series with 21st Century Star Wars special effects."
- Gayle Christensen

"Wtf is that yoda"
- Chris Martellaro


***

Well, what did you think? Did you watch "The Mandalorian"? (If you made it this far, I certainly hope so!) I'd love to hear your thoughts and have a nice, weekly conversation about the show. Feel free to add your thoughts to the comments section below, hit me up on Facebook, or tweet at me (@atownmania or @sottunderground). If you'd like to contribute to these posts in the future, we'd love to have you!

Episode 2 of "The Mandalorian" hits Disney+ this Friday, November 15, and then the weekly cycle will commence, with new episodes streaming each Friday, through December 27, 2019.

Until next time,

Do not self destruct. We’re shooting our way out.

Tuesday, October 22, 2019

WWE 2K20 preview: Who's out? Who's in? What's new?


Another year, another updated roster for WWE 2K. Let's take a moment to break down the changes and prepare for the brand new pro wrestling video game, which launches today, October 22, 2019. To view the entire announced roster for WWE 2K20, click here. Now, behold our breakdown of which wrestlers have been taken out and which characters are being added or returning, and get a look at an overview of some new features:

Who's out?

  • Legends
    • Alundra Blayze
    • Bam Bam Bigelow
    • British Bulldog
    • DDP
    • Greg Valentine
    • Lex Luger
    • Mr. Perfect
    • Rick Martel
    • Rick Rude
    • Ricky Morton
    • Rikishi
    • Robert Gibson
    • Sycho Sid
    • Tatanka
    • The Godfather
    • Vader
  • Those who just don't get enough TV time
    • Aiden English
    • Alexander Wolfe
    • Epico Colon
    • Jason Jordan
    • Killian Dane
    • Konnor
    • Lio Rush
    • Primo Colon
    • Rhyno
    • Viktor
  • Those no longer with the company
    • Chris Jericho
    • Dean Ambrose
    • Goldust
    • Hideo Itami
    • Nick Young
    • TJ Perkins
    • Tye Dillinger
  • Alternate attires
    • Chris Jericho '00
    • Daniel Bryan '12
    • Daniel Bryan '13
    • John Cena Retro
    • Randy Orton '13
    • Sting '98 (Wolfpac)
    • Sting 2010s
    • Triple H '14

Who's in?

  • Main roster
    • Buddy Murphy
    • Nikki Cross
    • Zelina Vega (playable)
  • NXT / NXT UK
    • Io Shirai
    • Jaxson Ryker
    • Keith Lee
    • Mark Andrews
    • Matt Riddle
    • Mia Yim
    • Rhea Ripley
    • Tommaso Ciampa
    • Toni Storm
    • Trent Seven
  • 205 Live
    • Humberto Carillo
  • Legends
    • Jerry "The King" Lawler
    • Mark Henry
    • Molly Holly
    • X-Pac
  • Managers
    • Bobby Heenan
    • Drake Maverick
  • Alternate attires
    • Bayley '15
    • Bayley '17
    • Becky Lynch '15
    • Becky Lynch '17
    • Charlotte Flair '14
    • Charlotte Flair '15
    • Charlotte Flair '17
    • Charlotte Flair '18
    • Maria Kanellis '08
    • Natalya '14
    • Natalya '16
    • Nia Jax '17
    • Nikki Bella '15
    • Nikki Bella '16
    • Sasha Banks '15
    • Sasha Banks '16
    • Sasha Banks '17
    • Triple H '01
    • Undertaker '91
  • Season Pass DLC (available at launch)
    • Braun Strowman - "Bump in the Night" alternate attire
    • Bray Wyatt - "Bump in the Night" alternate attire
    • Chyna - Deluxe Edition
    • "The Fiend" Bray Wyatt - "Bump in the Night" pre-order bonus
    • Finn Balor - "Bump in the Night" alternate attire
    • Hulk Hogan - Deluxe Edition
    • Mandy Rose - "Bump in the Night" alternate attire
    • Mankind - Deluxe Edition
    • Nikki Cross - "Bump in the Night" alternate attire
    • Randy Orton - "Bump in the Night" alternate attire
    • The Rock: $500 Shirt - Deluxe Edition
    • Sasha Banks - "Bump in the Night" alternate attire
    • Sheamus  - "Bump in the Night" alternate attire

By the Numbers

WWE 2K20 includes:
  • 186 unique playable characters on-disc (excluding DLC)
    • Same number as the 2K19 roster
  • 225 playable characters on-disc, including alternate versions of superstars
    • Three less than 2K19
  • 47 unique playable women on-disc
    • Five more than 2K19, including DLC
  • 238 total characters on-disc, including managers and MyCareer original characters
    • Fourteen less than 2K19
[Thanks to The Smackdown Hotel for providing these numbers.]

Roster take-aways

Honestly, the only characters I'll miss playing with are DDP and Chris Jericho. Jericho is one of my all-time favorite wrestlers, so he'll be a big loss for the 2K20 roster. (It's an easy fix, though. I'm sure there will be a created wrestler that is the spitting image of Y2J within hours of launch.) Everybody else that has been removed was someone that I rarely (if ever) played with, and most of them have either been off of TV for so long that I don't care about them or is a legend that was popular before my time, so I'm good with it. Cutting the dead weight. I approve.

As far as additions go, 2K is finally adding the three most glaring omissions from last year's game: Buddy Murphy, Nikki Cross and Tommaso Ciampa. A bunch of NXT talent joins the roster this time around, including big names like Io Shirai, Keith Lee and "The Original Bro" Matt Riddle. Perhaps the best additions to this year's game come via the Deluxe Edition, with the return of the hardcore legend Mankind, the immortal Hulk Hogan and (for the first time ever) the Eighth Wonder of the World, Chyna. The last-minute inclusion of Bray Wyatt's most recent incarnation, The Fiend, is great, too.

What else is new?

This year's Showcase Mode will focus on the story of the Four Horsewomen and the Women's Evolution in WWE, so we'll be treated to a bunch of retro alternative attires for the likes of Charlotte Flair, Bayley, Sasha Banks and Becky Lynch, among other prominent female characters.

There will be a Tower specifically dedicated to the career of cover co-star Roman Reigns. The tower will cover classic rivalries with Brock Lesnar, John Cena, the Undertaker and more.

In a first for the series, players will finally be able to create women wrestlers for use in MyCareer mode. Certainly, this is a good step for the inclusion of female gamers who want to have a more relatable story to play.

Arguably the most innovative change coming to 2K20 is the "WWE 2K Originals" concept, which will put unique twists on familiar characters. "2K Originals" will be available as paid DLC for gamers, beginning with the horror-themed "Bump in the Night" pack, headlined by The Fiend Bray Wyatt. Along with the freaky iteration of the former swamp dweller will come a handful of alternate, Halloween-like attires that transform our favorite superstars into monstrous versions of themselves. The mode will take players through original storylines ripped from the realms of science fiction and beyond. While we're don't know an incredible amount about the new mode right now, it will certainly open up the flood gates of creativity for the future of the franchise.

I wanted it and we're getting it!

  • Mixed Match Challenge: Mirroring the popular annual competition that WWE has started hosting, 2K gamers will finally be able to create tag teams and play matches with mixed-gender partners. Want to play with John Cena and Sasha Banks? Would you like to pair the popular real-life MMC team of Braun Strowman and Alexa Bliss? Care to match up against Sheamus and Becky Lynch? We'll finally get the chance to do it in 2K20.

Quick Q&A

  • Who will be the first wrestlers you play with in 2K20?
    • I'll probably take advantage of the long-awaited return of Hulk Hogan, but I'm definitely going to use The Fiend very early on.
  • Are there any superstars that you are more excited to play with in 2K20 than you have been in the past?
    • Ricochet, Samoa Joe, Ali, Tommaso Ciampa and Johnny Gargano, Bayley, Sasha Banks
  • Are there any superstars that you are less excited to play with in 2K20 than you have been in the past?
    • Seth Rollins, Braun Strowman, AJ Styles, Becky Lynch
  • Are there any superstars that you have no intention of playing with in 2K20?
    • Andre the Giant, most of the cruiserweights or new NXT talent, Bobby Fish, Authors of Pain, Tamina, Nia Jax, X-Pac
  • Who are you most looking forward to beating up?
    • Matt Riddle and Roderick Strong, for sure. Probably Baron Corbin and Shane McMahon, too.
  • What is your weapon of choice?
    • Kendo stick, easy.
  • What feature are you most looking forward to?
    • As usual, probably Universe Mode. I created a new promotion called "Friday Fight Night" last year, and I think I'd like to reboot that, but without drafting out the entire roster to RAW, Smackdown! and Fight Night. There's too much unused talent if you do it that way. I'll probably draft about 20 or 25 people to each brand, then leave a big pool of unused free agents so I don't have to worry about leaving out popular superstars from my rivalries and storylines. I also think the 2K Originals mode is going to be fun.

The Bottom Line:

Admittedly, I've seen some less-than-stellar reviews for 2K20 so far, so that's a little troubling, but I have heard good things about the creativity of 2K Originals, so I'll give it the benefit of the doubt and make up my own mind. It will be nice to have a new, updated roster, despite the loss of Jericho, which pains me to the core. It seems like there aren't a ton of new features right off the bat, so I'm hoping they're focusing on improving existing modes and features. Time will tell, I suppose.

For now, enjoy a couple WWE 2K20 videos to get you hyped:

And if you're in the mood for even more WWE content, don't forget about my recent interview with the infamous WWE villain Vickie Guerrero, which can be found here. Enjoy! See you jabronis in the ring.

Thursday, October 3, 2019

MLB TV Viewing Stats - 2019


Last year, I had the insane idea to keep track of every single baseball game I watched using Major League Baseball's streaming service, MLB TV. I did so, and kept track of all of my viewing habits that you can find in a blog by clicking here.

I did the same thing in 2019 but decided to ramp up my findings with additional statistics. Here are the things I took note of any time that I watched a baseball game this year:
  • Road team
  • Home team
  • Broadcast (which team's TV feed I tuned into)
  • Winning team
  • W/L result of the team whose broadcast I watched
  • Duration of viewing
    • 1-2 innings: "Minimal"
    • 3-4 innings: "Partial"
    • 5-7 innings: "Most"
    • 8-9 innings: "Full"
  • Any interesting notes about the game

By keeping track of these statistics, I have been able to determine whether I am getting my money's worth out of my annual MLB TV subscription and can also (somewhat sarcastically) tell whether I am a good or bad luck charm for the teams I cheer for.

Before we get down to the nitty-gritty, let's review a couple important things, including some stuff that I talked about in last year's blog, to present the broader scope of my investigation:

Factors That Affected My Viewing Habits in 2019:

  • MLB TV imposes blackout restrictions on Salt Lake City viewers for any games played by the Colorado Rockies and Arizona Diamondbacks, which means I can't watch Colorado or Arizona play at all, regardless of who or where they play.
  • There are additional blackout restrictions for major, nationally televised games, such as "Sunday Night Baseball" or other big games aired by Fox, ESPN, etc., and those games are also unviewable on MLB TV.
  • September was not a great month for my MLB TV viewing. I was busy doing other things, like running social media for FanX Salt Lake Comic Convention and, you know, getting married and moving and other miscellaneous adult tasks. I didn't watch any baseball between September 3 - September 26.



Untracked Games:

  • I watched one Spring Training game on MLB TV, before the regular season started. I tracked this on my spreadsheet but will not be including it in my statistics for purposes of this particular blog.
  • I watched a handful of the nationally televised games on TV; I did not count these as "games watched" in my tracker, so I technically watched a little more baseball than what I'm accounting for in this blog.
  • During the 2019 season, I physically attended games in San Francisco, Cleveland and Cincinnati. I did not count these as "games watched," either.


Total Number of Games and Cost Per Game Watched:

  • There are 30 teams in the MLB, each playing 162 games, for a total of 4,860 games in an entire season.
    • I now realize that this number is actually counting each game (e.g., Orioles vs Yankees) as two games - one Orioles game and one Yankees game. To account for this, the number 4,860 should actually be divided in half to represent the number of actual 9-inning games that are played in a season: 2,430.
      • (Note: This was not explained in last year's blog, although I believe the meaning of my message was not misunderstood.)
  • The 2019 MLB season ran from March 28, 2019 - September 29, 2019, over a span of 186 days. It is not uncommon for there to be some days during the regular season when no games are played by any team.
  • In last year's blog, I was a bit overzealous when I calculated the number of games I plausibly could have watched in one season. I ran the numbers as if I could possibly watch a maximum of two games per day for every single day of the season. That's just not realistic. Here are some notes about how I calculated things in 2019:
    • Last year, I calculated that all Rockies and Diamondbacks games, plus nationally televised games, would be about 5% of the overall total of games played. Upon further consideration, Colorado and Arizona games (324 total) would account for 6.6% of total MLB games. I'm not sure how many nationally televised games there are per season, but it's safe to say that there is at least one blacked-out game per week of the season (we'll call it 26 weeks). This would add up to a total of about 7% (about 350 games) that I simply don't have access to.
    • Although it is probably only reasonable to watch a maximum of one baseball game per day, there were some days where I did watch at least part of multiple games in a given day, even if I didn't watch all of the games from start to finish. This year, instead of multiplying the number of days in the season by 2 to determine the maximum number of games I could have watched, I will only multiply it by 1.5.
    • If there are 186 days in the season and I multiply that by 1.5, as explained above, I am brought to a total of 279 games. From that, I'm subtracting 7% (Rockies and Diamondbacks games, plus 26 blackouts), and subtract an additional 5 games (to represent any nationally televised games that I actually did watch on TV). This brings the maximum number of games that I plausibly could have watched in 2019 to an even 248.
  • In 2019, I watched at least a "minimal" portion (as defined above) of 65 games on the MLB TV app.
    • This averages out to be about 2.6% of all games played for the entire league (2,430).
    • Based on the plausible maximum number of games I could have watched, my calculations show that I watched about 26% of those games. Not bad!
  • To calculate my "cost per game watched," I divided the dollar amount I paid by the number of games I watched on the app, which comes out to $1.85 per game. That's a dollar per game better than 2018!


Duration of Viewing:

  • Based on the definitions previously listed, here's how long I watched the 65 games, listed in order of frequency:
    • Partial: 29 games (44.6%)
    • Most: 19 games (29.2%)
    • Full: 9 games (13.8%)
    • Minimal: 8 games (12.3%)


Overall W/L Record:

  • Of the 65 games that I watched on MLB TV in 2019, the teams whose broadcast I watched were 40-25 (.615).
  • Note: There were two "Game of the Day" broadcasts that I watched on the app, which featured a neutral broadcast team. In terms of the overall W/L record, I determined the wins and losses for those games based on the team that I wanted to win.


Home/Road Split:

  • Of the 65 games I watched, the team I tuned in to watch played 41 home games and 22 games on the road.
  • When I watched a team's home broadcast, those teams went 24-17 (.604).
  • When I watched a team's road broadcast, the teams went 14-8 (.636).
  • Note: I did not count the two "Game of the Day" games as either "home" or "road," which explains why only 63 of the 65 games were accounted for in this breakdown.


Times Watched (Total, Out of 130 Total Teams Watched):

  • Texas Rangers: 19
  • Cleveland Indians: 14
  • Cincinnati Reds: 9
  • Detroit Tigers: 8
  • Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim: 7
  • Seattle Mariners: 7
  • Washington Nationals: 7
  • Los Angeles Dodgers: 6
  • New York Mets: 6
  • Milwaukee Brewers: 4
  • Minnesota Twins: 4
  • Oakland Athletics: 4
  • Pittsburgh Pirates: 4
  • St. Louis Cardinals: 4
  • Atlanta Braves: 3
  • Boston Red Sox: 3
  • Chicago Cubs: 3
  • Kansas City Royals: 3
  • New York Yankees: 3
  • Philadelphia Phillies: 3
  • Toronto Blue Jays: 3
  • Chicago White Sox: 2
  • San Diego Padres: 2
  • Tampa Bay Rays: 1
  • San Francisco Giants: 1


The Forgotten Five:

  • Here are the five teams that I didn't (*or couldn't) watch a single time last year:
    • Arizona Diamondbacks*
    • Baltimore Orioles
    • Houston Astros
    • Colorado Rockies*
    • Miami Marlins
  • This is the second year in a row in which I did not watch the Miami Marlins a single time.



W/L Records for Every Team I Watched, Regardless of Broadcast:

  • San Francisco Giants: 1-0 (1.000)
  • Oakland Athletics: 3-1 (.750)
  • Texas Rangers: 14-5 (.736)
  • New York Mets: 4-2 (.666)
  • Chicago Cubs: 2-1 (.666)
  • Cleveland Indians: 9-5 (.642)
  • Cincinnati Reds: 5-4 (.555)
  • Los Angeles Dodgers: 3-3 (.500)
  • Milwaukee Brewers: 2-2 (.500)
  • Minnesota Twins: 2-2 (.500)
  • San Diego Padres: 1-1 (.500)
  • Philadelphia Phillies: 1-1 (.500)
  • Chicago White Sox: 1-1 (.500)
  • Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim: 3-4 (.428)
  • Seattle Mariners: 3-4 (.428)
  • Washington Nationals: 3-4 (.428)
  • Atlanta Braves: 1-2 (.333)
  • Boston Red Sox: 1-2 (.333)
  • Kansas City Royals: 1-2 (.333)
  • New York Yankees: 1-2 (.333)
  • St. Louis Cardinals: 1-3 (.250)
  • Pittsburgh Pirates: 1-3 (.250)
  • Detroit Tigers: 1-7 (.125)
  • Tampa Bay Rays: 0-1 (.000)
  • Toronto Blue Jays: 0-3 (.000)


W/L Records for Teams Whose Broadcast I Watched (out of 63 games):

  • Oakland Athletics: 1-0 (1.000)
  • St. Louis Cardinals: 1-0 (1.000)
  • San Francisco Giants: 1-0 (1.000)
  • Texas Rangers: 14-5 (.736)
  • Cleveland Indians: 9-4 (.692)
  • Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim: 2-1 (.666)
  • Seattle Mariners: 2-1 (.666)
  • Cincinnati Reds: 4-3 (.571)
  • Washington Nationals: 3-3 (.500)
  • Atlanta Braves: 1-1 (.500)
  • Los Angeles Dodgers: 2-3 (.400)
  • Chicago Cubs: 0-1 (.000)
  • Chicago White Sox: 0-1 (.000)


Other Fun Facts About Games I Watched:

  • I watched the first game of the season (Mets @ Nationals). Robinson Cano homered in his first at-bat as a Met.
  • I watched the final Opening Day at Globe Life Park in Texas.
  • I saw Patrick Corbin's debut for the Washington Nationals.
  • I watched three games that went to extra innings.
  • I saw Bryce Harper's return to Washington as a member of the Philadelphia Phillies.
  • I watched a game on Jackie Robinson Day.
  • I saw a bunch of games that were won on walk-off hits, including one that ended on a grand slam, and one in which Cleveland's Carlos Santana hit his second walk-off winner in consecutive days.
  • I watched a Dodgers game that my parents attended in L.A. It ended with a walk-off home run in the bottom of the 9th.
  • I saw Rougned Odor get thrown out at home while trying for an inside-the-park home run.
  • I watched the end of the game where the Angels threw a combined no-hitter in their first game after the unexpected death of their pitcher Tyler Skaggs.
  • I saw several games that were affected by rain delays, including a game in Cleveland that was stopped twice - and ultimately ended prematurely in the 8th inning.
  • I saw the Indians' Shane Bieber throw a complete game shutout with one hit on 102 pitches.
  • I watched a 14-inning game from start to finish.
  • I saw Cincinnati's Jesse Winker hit a home run on the first pitch of the bottom of the 1st inning.
  • I watched a game during Players' Weekend.
  • I watched the Rangers game in which they retired Michael Young's number. Texas overcame a 2-1 deficit in the bottom of the 9th to win, 3-2.
  • I watched as the Reds celebrated long-time radio broadcaster Marty Brenneman's final home broadcast.
  • In his final start of the season, I saw Texas' Mike Minor pitch 9.2 innings to end the year with exactly 200 strikeouts.
  • I watched the final game played at Globe Life Park in Texas, on the final day of the season.

***

So there you go. Them's the stats. Bless and praise you if you actually read this entire post. Sure, it's nerdy. Sure, it doesn't really matter. Many may consider this a complete waste of time. But you know what? I'm paying money for this thing each year and I want to make sure I'm getting good value out of it. But whatever. Baseball is great and I love it. Like I said in 2018, at least now I can die in peace, knowing that all this pointless information is stored digitally online.


THE END

Monday, September 9, 2019

#FanX Fall 19: "EXCUSE ME!!" - An interview with WWE's Vickie Guerrero


I had the chance to chat with WWE's villainous manager Vickie Guerrero during FanX Fall 19 in Salt Lake City last weekend. On-screen, she was irritating, annoying and universally despised. Vickie broke into World Wrestling Entertainment in 2005, being incorporated into storylines with her husband, the late WWE Hall of Famer Eddie Guerrero, and has since spent more than a decade as the recipient of relentless boos from the WWE Universe. Her shrill cries of "EXCUSE ME!!" send audiences across the country into a frenzy and maintain her reputation as one of the most reviled personas in the history of professional wrestling.

Her appearance at the convention last weekend was a surprise to many; she announced that she was in town in a social media post on September 5, the first day of FanX, and it became my immediate goal to track her down for an interview. Unlike her TV character, Vickie couldn't have been more pleasant in person. She was kind, friendly and remembered me on each day of the convention as I passed by her booth.

Here's my interview with Vickie, recorded on the second day of FanX Fall 2019:


Signs of the Times: All right, Vickie. How are you doing?
Vickie: “I’m great. How are you?”

SotT: Doing great. Thanks for coming out.
V: “It’s my pleasure. I love Salt Lake City. The people and the fans are just so wonderful to me. No one has thrown any food, so that’s good.”

SotT: Awesome. Not yet. That’s good. All right, awesome. I just wanted to ask you a few questions about your career. First of all, what got you into wrestling? Was it [late husband] Eddie? Or did you have an interest in that before?
V: “No, you know what? Before I met Eddie, I hated wrestling. I was in a family [with] five younger brothers. I couldn’t stand it. I was a cheerleader and a dancer, but when I dated Eddie, I kind of was like, ‘Fine, whatever.’ It slowly started growing on me and I had a big respect for it. Once I got married to Eddie, I just loved it. I started falling in love with the sport.”

SotT: Ok. Tell me about the “Excuse me!” catch phrase. [Both laugh] Where did that come from and how did it catch on so quickly?
V: “’Excuse me!’ came from me forgetting my promo lines one night. They gave me a promo that changed maybe like three or four times before we went live, and I just messed it up and the crowd was just being so awful with me that I just kind of yelled ‘Excuse me!’ at them. They kind of roared back, and I was kind of like, ‘Wait a minute…’ [Laughs] I didn’t think it was going to catch on until the writers said, ‘Let’s try this again,’ and the more times we did it, the crowd started recognizing that that was going to be my catch phrase. Eighteen years later, I’m still doing it, so it’s been great.”

SotT: Yeah. So, you were in the Women’s Royal Rumble, weren’t you?
V: “Yes – the first one.”

SotT: That’s right. I remember because, “Excuse me!” hit, and I said, “No! No way!” [Both laugh]
V: “I was so excited! That’s such a great honor to be in the first one. It was a lot of fun. I got to see my old friends and then meet the new women on the roster. Number 16 will be my lucky number forever.”

SotT: Awesome. Can you tell me a little bit about the “Women’s Evolution” in wrestling and where you see that going in the future?
V: “I think it’s been a great change for the women’s division. I mean, you take maybe eight to ten years before that, and the women were just eye candy for the show. The women back then were really talented, and they wanted to have these good matches that had quality time [on television], so to see how it’s changing and they’re getting the opportunity to main-event Wrestlemania, main-event “RAW” and “SmackDown!”… I’m really proud of where it’s [come] today.”

SotT: Great. Do you have any people that you really enjoyed working with – any favorite rivals or anyone that you were a manager of, or anything like that?
V: “Yeah, I think my favorite storylines were with Undertaker and Edge, Dolph Ziggler, the McMahons, ‘LayCool,’ Betty White, the Muppets… It goes on and on! [Laughs]”

SotT: What has been your favorite part of being in Salt Lake City this weekend?
V: “You know, I’m not on the Celebrity Row, but I came through a vendor and I love it because I can take my time and talk to the fans. They can share their stories, I can share mine, and it’s just a good quality time to enjoy their company. This is a blessing for me to be here.”

SotT: Well, thank you so much for coming. We’re so glad that you’re here.
V: “Thank you! I appreciate it!”


***

Vickie Guerrero can be followed on Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and at vickieguerrero.net. For future #FanX content and more blogs about wrestling, you know what to do. Keep it here with Signs of the Times.


Wednesday, September 4, 2019

LOST: The Top 5 Mysteries


In 2008, JJ Abrams presented a TED Talk called "The Mystery Box." You can watch the 18-minute presentation below:


In his presentation, Abrams relates a story about buying a sealed box of magic tricks for $15. He was told that the contents of the box were worth $50. However, he has never opened the box. He leaves it, sealed, in his office. Why? Abrams explains, "I find myself drawn to infinite impossibility." Mystery, he says, is the catalyst for imagination, and sometimes mystery is more important than knowledge.

Here are a couple of articles that may shed some additional light on the concept of "mystery box" storytelling:

So what were a few of the "mystery boxes" in "LOST"?
  • What, exactly, was the Island?
  • What made Walt special?
  • Why were there polar bears on the Island?
  • Why couldn't women on the Island have children?
  • What on earth was the Smoke Monster?

It was this particular type of storytelling that made "LOST" a smash hit TV show when it debuted 15 years ago in 2004. The show succeeded, in part, because the writers provided so many questions up front without immediate payoff, keeping the audience guessing for seasons at a time - all in an era without the spoiler-rampant culture of social media and binge-watching to ruin surprises in advance.

Of course, the series' divisive and controversially ambiguous ending left some fans furious at the apparent lack of answers to some of the Island's biggest mysteries. Admittedly, not all of the twists worked as well as they could have, but some of those surprises were absolutely brilliant. Here are our five favorites (with a few others receiving honorable mention):

5. The Man from Tallahassee

Anthony Cooper was a real piece of work. From stealing one of his son's kidneys then pushing him out a window, Cooper's constant manipulation of poor John Locke was tough to watch. In "The Man from Tallahassee," Ben Linus brings Cooper to the Island to be confronted by Locke. Later, in "The Brig," animosity between Locke and Cooper reached a boiling point. Locke calls in James "Sawyer" Ford to kill Cooper when "LOST" dropped a bomb that even the Dharma Initiative would be proud of.

It is then revealed that Cooper is also the original "Tom Sawyer" - the man who conned James Ford's parents and whose moniker was adopted by the Island's resident redneck. After years of searching, Sawyer had finally found the man who ruined his life.

4. Jeremy Bentham

For the entirety of Season 4, we wondered who on earth Jeremy Bentham was and why his death was so unsettling for the Oceanic Six. In a dramatic turn of events, we find out that the body in that coffin is none other than John Locke, who we didn't even know ever made it off the Island!

Equally as shocking was finding out who put him in the coffin to begin with. Although Jack Shephard and the gang were led to believe that Bentham had committed suicide, it turns out that Locke was prevented from killing himself by a perfectly timed visit from Ben Linus. However, mere moments after talking Locke off of the ledge, Ben strangles him to death in the emotional conclusion of the Season 5 episode "The Life and Death of Jeremy Bentham."

ScreenRant.com lists seeing Locke in the coffin and watching Ben kill Bentham as two of their Top 25 moments of "LOST."

3. The Numbers
Rarely does a TV show ingrain something as clearly in the minds of its viewers as "LOST" did with the numbers 4, 8, 15, 16, 23 and 42. Were the Numbers special? Were they bad luck? Did entering them into the computer at the Hatch really save the world? Did they even do anything at all? Such were the mysteries of those lottery-winning digits. In Season 6, we discovered that the Numbers were linked to "Candidates" who were being brought to the Island by Jacob as a way to select a new Protector.

The Numbers also served as Easter eggs, from blatant usage such as "Oceanic 815" to other less obvious appearances. To the keenly trained eye, the Numbers were everywhere. All these years later, we can't help but repeat them every time we fly into LAX.


2. Not Penny's boat

In perhaps the most tragic of twists, Charlie Pace put a Sharpie to good use and spent the waning moments of his life to inform Desmond Hume that the freighter the survivors had just made contact with was not who they thought it was. Nope. It was "NOT PENNY'S BOAT," after all. His dying message became one of the most widely recognized images of the entire series.

IGN.com ranks "Through the Looking Glass" as the second best episode of the series, next to "The Constant."

1. "We have to go back!"

So you mean those flashbacks in Season 4 were actually flash-forwards?! In. Sane. At the shocking conclusion of "There's No Place Like Home," it is revealed that Jack has constantly been booking flights, hoping that he crashes back onto the Island. In a drunken bender, he begs Kate Austen to meet him at the airport where he pleads those classic lines -- say them with us -- "We have to go back, Kate! We have to go back!"


Without a doubt, this is the most classic and best twist in all of "LOST." Over the course of four seasons, viewers had grown to know the age-old formula: on-Island drama, off-Island flashback. But in the Season 4 finale, they flipped the script (quite literally) by treating everything like a flashback and revealing the first of many mind-bending time jumps to come.

Honorable Mention:

***

What are your favorite mysteries from "LOST"? Do you agree with us? Did we leave anything off the list? Let us know in the comments section below or on Twitter at @SotTUnderground.

As always,

Namaste... and good luck.

Wednesday, August 7, 2019

Is 'Hobbs & Shaw' an enjoyable stand-alone movie?


"The Land Before Time" sequels. Dungeons & Dragons. "Hello Kitty." Ugg boots. Math 1060. These are all things that I know exist, but I can't tell you a single thing about them.

Here's another one: the "Fast & the Furious" franchise. I know that it's out there and I know that they're still spitting out movies, but my vast knowledge of popular culture barely scrapes the surface of Vin Diesel's greatest contribution to society. Let's break it down.

Here is every single thing I knew about the "Fast & the Furious" franchise on August 6, 2019:
  • For starters, I saw "2 Fast 2 Furious" twice (ironically) in high school because I worked at a movie theater when it came out and I didn't have to pay either time. I swear, I only went the second  time because one of my friends asked really nicely. In retrospect, it was one of the stupidest, most profanity-laced movies I have ever seen. Collectively, those were five hours of my life that I can never get back.
  • I knew that the movies are typically filled with fancy cars, scantily clad women and ludicrous heists. (That's a pun because I remember that Ludacris was in "2 Fast 2 Furious.") But yeah, I guess that's what they do in these shows, right? They... steal stuff in their fancy cars?
  • Many moons ago, I was talked into Redboxing "Fast Five," I think. Whichever one The Rock was introduced in. Other than that, I don't remember anything about it.
  • They love talking about "family."
  • Paul Walker died just before the seventh movie. There is some scene at the end that, I guess, made some people cry.
  • I watched the end of "The Fast & the Furious (1)" a couple years ago. I didn't recall it being particularly good.
  • Long story short (too late), I randomly got a free digital copy of "The Fate of the Furious (8)" a year or two ago. I have never watched a second of it, but I know that it's sitting in my VUDU.
  • The debut trailer for the first F&F spin-off, "Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw," looked like a heck of a lot of fun. I think it aired as a 2019 Super Bowl commercial. I knew that Hobbs and Shaw were both villains in previous films, once upon a time, but it looked like they'd both turned good for the new movie. I assumed that they really hate each other. By the looks of it, they'd reluctantly work together to stop the self-proclaimed "Black Superman," Idris Elba.

  • Last week, I saw that there was a marathon of many of the previous F&F movies on USA and SyFy. I recorded as many as I could find (I think I got 1 through 5) to see if it was worth binge-watching them all before potentially checking out the spin-off.
  • The other day, I watched a nine-minute video recap of all F&F movies leading up to "Hobbs & Shaw," which I suppose was enlightening to some extent, but I couldn't repeat back to you any of what I learned, even if you offered to pay me.
  • Last Friday night, I attempted to live-tweet "The Fast & the Furious (1)." I fell asleep before the movie was over because it was so unbearably bad. Again, I can confidently say that it is probably one of the worst movies (quality-wise) that I have ever seen. Would not recommend. Would not watch again.

That's it. That's all I knew before about 6:15 last night. Recently, my brother had asked me on several occasions to go see "Hobbs & Shaw" with him, and a $5 ticket to see it in IMAX on Tuesday night was too good an offer for me to pass up.

Still, one resounding question burned in my mind like a face full of exhaust from a 1969 Camaro:

  • Would I be able to enjoy a Fast & the Furious spin-off movie, considering my truly minimal familiarity with the franchise? Could "Hobbs & Shaw" be an enjoyable stand-alone movie?

I'll give it to you straight, my friends:

Heck yeah, I enjoyed it.

From this point on, I'm going to try to keep things mostly spoiler-free, but I'm going to leave this warning here, just in case you want to go into "Hobbs & Shaw" completely blind.


"Hobbs & Shaw" follows Luke Hobbs (Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson) and Deckard Shaw (Jason Statham) in their mission to stop a technologically and mechanically enhanced villain (played by Idris Elba) from unleashing a biochemical virus that would turn humans' internal organs to jelly. Yeah, I'm pretty sure I explained that right. I mean, it's completely preposterous from top to bottom, right from the start.

It turns out that one of my assumptions about the plot was right: they do really hate each other. Due to their clashing personalities, they struggle to work together to achieve their common goal. The movie kicks off by highlighting and contrasting those differences - The Rock's punch-through-problems attitude and Statham's suave British style - in a fun and frenzied beat-'em-up montage. Right away, I knew this movie was going to be totally chaotic and utterly silly.

Elba's character is an imposing force - and one of the better, cooler on-screen bad guys in recent memory - made seemingly unstoppable by his natural physique and robotic enhancements. He's not a superhero, but the man is practically super-human; it turns out that the whole "Black Superman" brag is not unreasonable.

Things go a awry early on and Hobbs and Shaw are framed for an act of terrorism, causing them to take a more covert approach to their quest. The movie jaunts across the globe to several jaw-dropping locations, including London, Moscow and a couple other destinations that I won't mention here. It's a gorgeous-looking movie and it was real nice in IMAX.

I'm not sure how seriously the other F&F movies take themselves, but "Hobbs & Shaw" established a completely over-the-top nature immediately. I'm not sure how many physicists or medical experts plan on seeing this movie, but I can't imagine they'll be pleased with the logic of any of it. I am neither scientist nor doctor and therefore couldn't have cared less about the reality of it all. You've got to know what you're getting yourself into here. It's explosive, it's wild, and it's not even slightly realistic.

The term "unapologetic self-awareness" came to mind as I took it all in. There were jokes in the dialogue about The People's Eyebrow, The Rock's propensity for wearing form-fitting clothing, Statham's role in "The Italian Job" and a slew of additional Easter eggs and jokes that came within a sliver of breaking the Fourth Wall. That stuff had me cracking up throughout most of the 2-hour-17-minute run time. It was as if "Hobbs & Shaw" was continuously winking into the proverbial camera, letting viewers in on the joke that THIS IS JUST A MOVIE. While I understand that that type of humor isn't for everyone, I thought that sense of outrageousness made the everything even more fun to watch.

Let it be known that not everything works. Some of the CGI was a bit suspect (but who cares?), one action scene early in the movie involving an interrogation room and a chair looked totally hokey (but who cares?) and, most egregiously, there was one bit of dialogue that leaned much too heavily on a character comedically lowering the pitch of his voice in order to sound more masculine; we saw that exact gag a year ago in "Avengers: Infinity War." I wasn't going to get bent out of shape about any of that, though. Just know, heading into it, that it's a silly movie that should not be - and does not want to be - taken seriously.

"Hobbs & Shaw" felt like a very long movie, but it never seemed slow and I was never even remotely bored. Furthermore, despite several references to previous movies in the franchise, I never felt lost out-of-the-loops. Surely, a couple moments would probably have been more meaningful to me if I had spent the better part of two decades watching these movies, but any references to previous plot points were almost always said in passing.

Another thing to keep in mind before hitting the theaters with the family is that there is quite a bit of adult language throughout. While the cumulative amount of swear words pales in comparison to "2 Fast 2 Furious," there are a ton a few references to male anatomy (some more obvious and explicit than others, and they taper off about half-way through), there's no shortage of terms like "S.O.B." and other similar British terms, and there is one (simultaneously uttered) use of the F-word, as well as another one that is not heard but pretty clearly mouthed through a pane of glass. So... this maybe wouldn't be a great show to recommend to Mama.

As the credits began to roll and my brother and I began to share our thoughts, I turned to him and asked him what his least favorite part of the movie was. He took the words right out of my mouth: sometimes, the dialogue was very difficult to understand. I am not positive whether this was because the movie is just generally very noisy, because some of the foreign accents were so thick, or a combination of the two, but there were a couple scenes where I literally had no idea what they were talking about. For instance, the use of permanent vocal distortion is used for one character, making anything they said rather tricky to decipher.

Quick side note: Speaking of "credits," there are two mid-credits scenes and one post-credits scene at the very end. They are generally played off for laughs and are not entirely consequential to the plot.

My brother asked me what my favorite part of the movie was. That was tough to pin down because there were a lot of really fun action scenes that I genuinely enjoyed. Unlike what I know about previous F&F films, H&S is not a heist movie. I'd classify it as more of an action/spy thriller - a ridiculous mix of the best parts of the "Mission: Impossible" and James Bond films. This movie was actually quite similar to the feel of "Mission: Impossible - Fallout," which I also thoroughly enjoyed seeing on in IMAX. Statham and Johnson's physical comedy was hilarious and I loved their quirky-yet-compatible chemistry. Those are two guys - and Elba, too - that I would not want to pick a fight with. It was just sheer brutality - non-stop, wall-to-wall action - and it was a blast to watch.

I also liked seeing my boy Roman Reigns (The Rock's actual cousin) in a supporting role late in the movie. It's good to see The Big Dog getting some love outside of WWE's "squared circle." He seems like a good guy in real life, no matter what pro wrestling fans think of his persona on TV, so I'm happy that he got the opportunity. I also recognized one of the other actors, who I realized after the movie was a lead character from the TV show "Fear the Walking Dead." I knew he looked familiar. There are also a couple other surprising cameos which I will not spoil here. They came as quite a shock to me, and you'll know who I'm talking about as soon as you see them.

Watching "Hobbs & Shaw" reminded me a lot of the time that my brother and I saw (and loved) "Kong: Skull Island," an equally preposterous CGI extravaganza. I knew "Skull Island" wasn't going to win the Oscar for Best Picture, but heck if I wasn't entertained. "Hobbs & Shaw" was similar in many ways. It's probably not even going to be nominated for any major awards, but it's just pure, adrenaline-riddled chaos, from start to finish. More than anything, it was a great excuse for me to take a break, kick back, relax and turn my brain off for a couple hours.

The Verdict:

Do you need to have an extensive knowledge of the Fast franchise before watching the spin-off?: No.
Is the movie a believable representation of the limits of the human body and/or man's extensive knowledge of science and physics? Heck no.
Did I like it anyway?: Heck yes.
Would I recommend it to my parents?: Unlikely.
Would I see it again in theaters?: Yes.
Knee-jerk star rating: 7 or 8 out of 10 stars.

Final Thoughts:

Admittedly, I went into this movie with very, very low expectations. I figured I may not totally understand the complexities of Hobbs and Shaw being forced to work together and some (if not most) of the plot may go over my head. I didn't think it was going to be great, but I thought I could have fun if I went in with an open mind. To the logical mind, the plot is total and abject nonsense, but I don't go to the theater looking to find flaws like that. It's just a movie. It's fiction. It's not real, people. For the mere sake of its tremendous entertainment value, I would definitely recommend this movie to anyone who is seeking a temporary reprieve from the chaos of current events, regardless of their familiarity with the pre-existing "Fast & Furious" franchise.

Take it from a guy who knew next-to-nothing about these movies beforehand: "Hobbs & Shaw" was a heck of a ride, a pleasant surprise and, unlike two of the movies that came before it, a movie that I am not ashamed to have seen.

***

Have you seen "Hobbs & Shaw"? What did you think? Are you a long-standing fan of these movies in the first place? Let us know in the comments below, on Facebook, Twitter or via carrier pigeon. We'd love to hear from you!

Monday, August 5, 2019

"Stranger Things: Season 3" Power Rankings


A funny thing happens when Netflix simultaneously releases all episodes of a new season of a popular program. Apparently, a LOT of people watch the whole thing that same day. Such was the case this past Fourth of July.

According to variety.com, Season 3 of the mega-popular Neflix Original "Stranger Things" reached 26.4 million unique users between July 4 - July 7, 2019, including an estimated 824,000 viewers who watched the entire eight-episode season within 24 hours.

Sheesh.

I, on the other hand, was on vacation in the mountains at the time the new season of "Stranger Things" hit Netflix, and I didn't get a chance to even start watching it for about a week. What I've come to learn is that, in this era of Millennial binge-watching, if you snooze, you lose. In this case, I snoozed on watching the season (and, subsequently, with sending out a poll for another round of power rankings), and I lost out on the popularity of this post. Basically, I missed the golden window of "Stranger Things" hype this time around, and, at this point, I am not sure anyone is even still talking about it.

Regardless, I feel an obligation to post updated character rankings, and am prepared to do so now. Also, I'm not really going to issue a clear and obvious SPOILER WARNING because if you took the time to read this, you were probably one of the people who binge-watched it all in one sitting, so congratulations, good for you and thanks for reading.

First, let me say that I really enjoyed Season 3 and think that it was probably the best season so far. Certainly, leaps and bounds better than Season 2, which, in retrospect, was not very good.

Secondly, let me point out that practically all of the so-called "bold predictions" we made in our Season 2 Virtual Roundtable were completely wrong. However, I did somewhat accurately predict that somebody would end up moving away from Hawkins. I'll add that to the tally of things that I have ever guess correctly, bringing my grand total, I think, to three.

And lastly, if you want a refresher of our Season 2 Power Rankings, click here.

Here we go:


Biggest Movers: Billy Hargrove, +10; Mike Wheeler, -9
New This Season: Robin, Murray "Bald Eagle" Bauman, Erica Sinclair, Alexei, Suzie the Mormon, Mrs. Wheeler, Mayor Larry Kline
Dropped From the Rankings: Bob "The Brain" Newby, Eight/Kali

Quick Analysis:

  • Jim Freaking Hopper. Two straight seasons at #1! (No way he's actually dead, BTW. Not a chance.)
  • Big season for Billy Hargrove, who was infested by the Mind Flayer and put up quite the fight against Eleven and the gang before his untimely and somewhat heroic demise. Also rose in popularity with middle-aged women.
  • Bad season for many of the O.G.s, including Mike, Will and Lucas, who all dropped no fewer than five spots in the rankings.
  • On the other hand, Eleven bounced back from a rough stretch in Season 2, and Dustin Henderson maintained his spot at #3.
  • Despite a lackluster showing from our favorite food court worker, Steve Harrington stayed in the top 10, landing at #6 but failing to land a date with his co-worker, who, it turns out, was a lesbian all along.
  • Speaking of which... There were a ton of new faces in Season 3, as well as the re-emergence of some minor characters from the last couple years. Scoops Ahoy sleuth Robin had a strong debut at #5, and the Russian-speaking duo of Murray "Bald Eagle" Bauman and Alexei wound up, INCREDIBLY IRONICALLY, at #7 and #11, respectively. Lucas' diminutive and incredibly annoying sister, Erica, crawled her way up the ranks to her ultimate destination at #9.
  • 'Twas an unfortunate first impression for Suzie the Mormon, Mrs. Wheeler and Mayor Larry Kline, who all debuted at the bottom of the power rankings. Better luck next time, folks.

There you have it! How did you like Season 3? Any major objections to the way the power rankings shook out? Let us know in the comments below, on Facebook or Twitter... unless you've moved on and don't want to talk about it anymore, in which case we totally understand.

Catch you on the flip side, friends. 🙃🙃🙃