Pages

Showing posts with label DVD review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DVD review. Show all posts

Saturday, February 20, 2016

Five reasons why SPECTRE didn't suck


When SPECTRE, the latest James Bond blockbuster, hit theaters in November 2015, I couldn't help but feel that its response was underwhelming, at best. I saw it that first weekend and I thought it was a pretty good show. It wasn't Skyfall, but it wasn't bad. Now, months later and a couple weeks after its release on Blu-ray and DVD, I still don't sense that there is any more excitement about the film that before. Few (if any) of my friends and known associates talked about seeing the movie in theaters and I'm not aware of anyone that ran out to the store to pick it up, now that it's on sale.

I think we can all agree that Lea Seydoux is the least attractive Bond girl of all time, but, other than that, I have a hard time understanding why SPECTRE wasn't a very popular Bond movie. It sits at a measly 63% on Rotten Tomatoes with an equally mediocre rating from audiences. I can think of a couple things that I wasn't necessarily wild about, but I truly believe, overall, that it deserves a bit more credit than it received. I'd like to list five of them in this blog.

[From this point forward, SPECTRE will be discussed in detail, including major spoilers.]

The dead are alive

If nothing else, the enormous scope of the Day of the Dead celebration in Mexico is jaw-dropping. The camera work is tremendous, highlighted by a long, uncut take as Bond traverses the Mexican rooftops. Admit it: when that building comes down and Bond lands on the couch, you chuckled. The brief foot-chase that ensues amidst thousands of costumed extras is undeniably a sight to behold, reminiscent of the Mardi Gras scenes in 1973's Live or Let Die. Also, the helicopter does barrel rolls! Eat your heart out, Fox McCloud! ...And let's not forget Daniel Craig's superb skeleton suit. That thing is stylin'.

"Writing's on the Wall"

Before I had even heard the song, I had heard that some people were unhappy with Sam Smith's theme song, "Writing's on the Wall." I'm still not sure why anybody disliked it. Again, it's not "Skyfall," which Adele knocked out of the park for the last film, but the more I heard Smith's take on the song, the more I liked it. What's more, if you can manage to ignore the practically naked dancers in the title sequence, I've always thought that the Daniel Craig intros have been quite good at storytelling. The opening credits play on the nostalgia of fans of the Daniel Craig era, giving nods to characters from the previous three Bond films, including Javier Bardem's Silva (Skyfall), Eva Green's Vesper (Casino Royale) and our dearly departed M, iconically portrayed by Dame Judy Dench. (Rest her soul.) Once the opening credits wrap, Sam Smith and the folks at MGM have you raring to go as the stage is set for SPECTRE.

The car chase

The fancy cars. The unloaded ammunition. "New York, New York" blasting from the stereo. Bond practically pushing the slow driver out of his way, only to have the old man land perfectly in a parking spot with an airbag to the face. The flames from the exhaust and the ejector seat. That's a fun scene that gives you pretty much everything you could hope for from a Bond car chase.

Honorable mention: Bond's airplane scene that ultimately ends in him driving the dang thing through a barn. Oh, baby.

Batista

After his success in Guardians of the Galaxy, I was excited to hear that former WWE wrestler Dave Bautista had earned a role as a Bond villain. The dude is a beast, no bones about it, and he's as physically imposing as ever in this role. Hinx is right up there, in terms of physicality, with any other Bond baddie. Who else compares? Jaws, certainly, but is there anyone else as overpowering as Batista? One of my favorite moments of his during is the fight scene on the train when he swats a cooking pot out of the air with his forearm. (#baller) It's just a shame that he's used so little in the film. His death is implied as he gets whipped out of the train and any possibility of him returning in a future film is practically impossible, but hey - we can dream, can't we?

Honorable mention: It's also nice to see Q (Ben Whishaw) and the new M (Ralph Fiennes) in action - and out in the field! I like these new guys.

Franz Oberhauser: What's in a name?

Some might argue that SPECTRE's weakest aspect is its main villain. They might say that Christoph Waltz's Oberhauser was "just some boring guy that we all knew was going to end up being Bond's brother." They might say, "We knew they he was going to be Bond's long-lost brother simply by watching the trailer. Big whoop." Big whoop? Big whoop?? My goodness, people! Have you no knowledge of nor familiarity with Bond films past?

It is revealed during one of the movie's most tense plot points that Franz Oberhauser, the man with such historical ties to James Bond (yes, indeed, they are adoptive brothers) at some point in life changed his name, nay, his identity, becoming a man fictitiously renamed Ernst Stavro Blofeld. ERNST STAVRO BLOFELD, PEOPLE!! Blofeld is, like, Bond's arch-nemesis! He is the most classic of all James Bond villains! He either appeared in or made his presence known in at least seven other films, so, other than 007, himself, he should be the most recognized character in any of the movies. No? Is this not ringing any bells? Did a light bulb not go off in your mind when you saw him holding a white cat? Did you not realize that this is the character that inspired Austin Powers' "Doctor Evil"? I think the biggest problem with the Blofeld Bomb was that too many moviegoers had no idea who he was supposed to be. While I was geeking out of my mind, the majority of the theater was probably thinking, "Ernst who??" Ugh. So disappointing.

I mean, we should have seen it coming, right? Blofeld was the head of SPECTRE in the old movies. Why wouldn't he be the big wig in this one? But I had no idea. Not a clue. I didn't see it coming and was genuinely surprised by the reveal. The idea that Blofeld is "the author of all of [Bond's] pain" was a nice touch - that he was the one that orchestrated most (if not all) of Bond's tragic losses, including those of Vesper and M. Unbeknownst to us all, Blofeld has been pulling the strings all along.

At a pivotal point in the film, Blofeld is gravely injured, leaving him his a nasty scar on one side of his face - his trademark physical feature. It was inevitable. It had to happen. And when it did, the transformation was complete. Guys... they rebooted Blofeld. Is that not amazing? What's even more exciting is that he didn't die. No, no. He's still alive and he'll be back for more movies. In my opinion, this is the best thing that came out of SPECTRE.

"Cuckoo!"

Conclusion

SPECTRE is a good Bond movie. It's not Skyfall and it's not Goldeneye, but, thankfully, it's not Moonraker or A View to a Kill, either. If this is Daniel Craig's final go in the tuxedo, you know what? He made me a believer. I was a harsh critic of his in the months leading up to his debut as 007 in Casino Royale and I think that Quantum of Solace was the worst Bond flick since Tomorrow Never Dies, but he was spectacular in Skyfall and did a good job in SPECTRE. He infamously insinuated that his days as James Bond were over, even commenting that he'd rather slit his wrists than do another movie. The degree of sarcasm contained in that comment is up for debate and it's also rumored that Craig is under contract for one more film, so I guess we'll see what happens. However, if this truly is his last movie, he got the girl (yuck) and rode off into the sunset, quite literally, so I suppose it would be a fitting end for his stint with the PP7. Only time will tell.

Did you see SPECTRE? Did you hate it? Did you like it? Was it the best/worst movie you've ever seen? Let SotT: Underground know in the comments below.

JAMES BOND WILL RETURN.

Monday, August 24, 2015

Did "Insurgent" derail any hope for Divergent franchise? (DVD review)

Insurgent (2015)

Starring: Shailene Woodley, Theo James, Kate Winslet, Miles Teller

--

Beatrice "Tris" Prior (Woodley) and Tobias "Four" Eaton (James) continue the fight of their lives in the follow-up to 2014's summer blockbuster "Divergent." After the discovery of a box containing society's biggest secret, Jeanine (Winslet) remains bent on tracking down each and every Divergent, in hopes that their special cerebral skill set will help her gain access to the metallic mystery. Now the dynamic Divergent duo must adjust to their newfound life on the run while searching for answers and new allies in the war against the Erudite.

--

The Verdict:

Simply put, "Insurgent" is just like the book it was based on - not nearly as good as its predecessor. While last year's "Divergent" brought hope for an exciting young adult fiction franchise that might rival "The Hunger Games," the sequel falls a bit flat with a slow-moving plot, sub-standard acting and shoddy CGI.

So what went wrong?

As if cut from the same cloth as Katniss Everdeen, Tris goes from a lovable, squeaky-voiced heroine to a bratty little whiner that will make you question why you ever liked her in the first place. While Woodley seems like a nice enough chick in real life, her gratingly obnoxious screams and her new Peter Pan haircut serve as equal distractions from the film. (During one particular dream sequence in the film, Woodley lets out a couple war cries that will honestly make you laugh.)

Other than James, who is, the Salt Lake City DVD Examiner supposes, as undoubtedly handsome as ever and does a good job of holding his own as the male lead in the movie, audiences will have a very tough time connecting to, really, anyone in the cast. James' good work as Four is counterbalanced by Ansel Elgort and Miles Teller, who are both flat, boring and under-developed as characters and seem to simply function as awkward, cliche-spouting supporting characters. Some of the dialogue is downright cringe-worthy.

But it isn't just the script and the acting that failed this movie. Much of the action, albeit dystopian fantasy, is absolutely unbelievable - and not in the good way - in the sense that the computer animation and green-screen scenes look obvious and cheap. They just don't look real. Even the untrained eye will be able to spot the special effects. Of course, there's got to be a lot of suspension of disbelief in movies such as "Insurgent," but some of the stuff you'll see in this movie looks like it's straight out of 2002.

For those that read the novel, there will most certainly be a lot to talk about after this movie. Discrepancies abound (was some of that stuff even actually in the book??) and there is one gigantic plot-bomb that should have been dropped at the end of the movie and inexplicably wasn't, so that was weird. The movie leaves a lot out and will likely be quite controversial in the eyes of the YA bibliophiles out there. Veronica Roth's second book in the Divergent series was hard enough to get through as it was - and the movie ain't much better. For a series so obsessed with trains, it's ironic that "Insurgent" could quite easily be the thing that derails many moviegoers' interest in this franchise.


--

Similar movies: "Divergent" (2014), "The Hunger Games" (2012), "The Maze Runner" (2014)

--

DVD bonus features:

- Audio in English, English Descriptive Audio, Spanish
- Subtitles in English, Spanish
- No other bonus features available on rental version

--

Directed by: Robert Schwentke
Studio: Summit Entertainment
Running time: 119 minutes
MPAA rating: PG-13 for "intense violence and action throughout, some sensuality, thematic elements and brief language," and including violence by and against women.
Costars Jai Courtney, Ansel Elgort, Ray Stevenson, Zoe Kravitz, Octavia Spencer, Daniel Dae Kim
DVD release date: August 4, 2015

--