Pages

Tuesday, September 21, 2021

FanX 21: LEGO Master Zack Macasaet interview


So there I was, minding my own business, making my way across the vendor floor at FanX Salt Lake Comic Convention 2021, in search of  pop culture LEGOs. I headed back to a booth I'd visited earlier in the day. Then, to my great surprise, just 24 hours after having finished "LEGO Masters" Season 2, I noticed several contestants from the TV show! I immediately recognized Caleb Schilling, and soon thereafter spotted several other familiar faces. This, honestly, was one of the most pleasant surprises of the entire weekend for me. I'm a reality TV junkie, and bumping into some people that I had literally just barely watched on Hulu got me really excited.

I strolled on over and began chatting with Zack Macasaet - a finalist from his season, who made it all the way to the end with his brother, Wayne. Here's some of what we discussed:


Signs of the Times: All right, so… Surprise! The LEGO Masters are here! First of all, tell me about the show. What was it like being on the show?


Zack Macasaet: It was a lot of pressure, trying to build under the clock. Coming in, there was a lot of uncertainty, whether or not were even going to be on the show! And then we didn’t even know if we were going to get knocked out in the first round or not. So me and my brother came out, flying like dragons…


SotT: That’s right!


ZM: And by the end of it, we pulled ourselves through to the finale! I don’t want to spoil it for anybody, but… Gotta watch the finale!


SotT: Did you have a build that was your favorite, out of the whole competition?


ZM: A build that was my favorite? The dragons. My brother’s would be the whale. People liked the hat, the pigs were awesome, the castle build at the end – near the end, where we’re stretching out six feet… a lot of great, awesome stuff.


SotT: That’s good. That’s good. What advice would you give to people who like LEGOs but want to take it, maybe, to the next level?


ZM: Oh, ok… My brother would say, “Build what you want.” That’s what my brother would say. For me, I’d say it’s all about trial and error. You just keep collecting your LEGO bricks, you put it together and come up with new things. And every idea is a good idea.


SotT: Cool. Cool, all right. Have you been to Utah before?


ZM: First time!


SotT: First time? All right! Quick trip for you, though.


ZM: Yeah, quick trip for me. I’m only here for… [I’ve been here] about three days. I was here for the finale, watching it with all the other LEGO Masters over here – we even have another finalist over here: Caleb. So you’ve got to get an interview with him, too.


SotT: Yeah, I’ve got to go talk to him, too!


ZM: Oh, yeah!


Update: I talked to Caleb, too, and a few others, as well, but didn't have time to do any more interviews.

Check out Zack's YouTube channel by clicking here.






Monday, September 20, 2021

FanX 2021: Rob Paulsen on the importance of fun and educational cartoons

 


The following interview took place during the opening press conference for FanX Salt Lake Comic Convention 2021:


Signs of the Times: Hello! Thanks for coming back, first of all. My name’s Aaron. I work with the FanX social media team. A lot of things have happened in the past two years since we had a convention – I got married and had a kid.


Jess Harnell: Good for you!


Jim Cummings and Rob Paulsen, in background: Woo hoo!


SotT: Having a child and working from home, I watch a lot of TV, but my choices in entertainment have changed quite a bit. So, my question for you guys is: what is the importance in making – I guess, producing – content that is both fun and educational? … I remember, growing up, watching “Animaniacs” and other shows. I learned a lot, and I still remember some of your songs, you know?


JH: Oh, great!


SotT: So, what is the importance for you making things that are fun and educational for kids?


JH: Rob, do you want to take that?


RP: Why is it important? I think you’ve already touched on it. The fact is that you’re now willing to share this with your children because it has enough subversive humor to entertain you, and I would submit you probably got jokes down the road from “Animaniacs” that you didn’t get when you first watched when you were a little guy.


JH: You won’t believe what’s coming.


RP: That was, as Mo [LaMarche] and everyone has said [earlier in the press conference], that is utterly by design – and not just on “Animaniacs” and “Pinky and the Brain.” I think that there are other shows that strive to do that, as well. But also, we have a big orchestra, we get to do great music – a lot of them are “earwigs.” I can sing, “Tunisia, Morocco, Uganda, Angola, Zimbabwe, Djibouti, Botswana…” a capella, and it doesn’t matter. It’s such a remarkable tune that Randy Rogel wrote.


JH: And he does it live, too, all the time.


JC: I can feel him stopping himself. [laughter] Must… not… sing… full… song!




RP:
Can I give you my own anecdotal evidence? My son is now 37, surprisingly. When my son was little, he lived for "The Muppets." I could watch "Muppets" all day.


JH: Yeah.


RP: I loved it. If my kid wanted to watch “Teletubbies,” I would have had a real problem.


JH: Oh, yeah!


RP: …Not with my child – and I understand why the rudimentary nature of “Teletubbies” and “Barney”… I understand why they work. But if I’m, in some respects, doomed to watch television with my kid, I could watch Big Bird all day. My kid can learn stuff – he can learn how to be kind and generous and count and all of that, without [me] thinking, “There’s not enough wine in the world for me!”


JC: And his youngest is 25, so it’s hard for [Rob] to… still learning stuff.


RP: Still learning!


JC: It’s tough!


RP: So, you’ve kind of answered your question for us because you’re the example, and thank you for that.


SotT: No, thank you!


JH: The one thing I’ll add is: I’ve always said that “Animaniacs,” in particular, is a Trojan horse because it’s an educational social satire masquerading as a kids’ show. That’s what it is.

Wednesday, August 11, 2021

Ranking the Jeopardy! Guest Hosts

 


When the news broke that Alex Trebek passed away in 2020, I started watching a lot of "Jeopardy!" And when I say "a lot of 'Jeopardy!'," I mean that I watched a ton of "Jeopardy!"

As a work-from-home, first-time father, I spend a lot of time on the couch, so I just started watching as much of it as I could. I started recording the syndicated episodes so I could catch the tail end of Alex's 37-year run, I watched literally every single episode that was on Netflix at the time and I even read Mr. Trebek's 2020 autobiography, The Answer Is....

My enthusiasm for the show didn't wane when the show announced an upcoming schedule of celebrity guest hosts - perhaps to find a permanent replacement for the late, great Alex Trebek. I was intrigued to find out how these guests would perform and anxious to find out who they'd ultimately pick as a successor. Needless to say, I feel qualified to write this blog because I've watched nearly every single episode with a guest host, other than a couple shows that didn't record, due to weird glitches with my DVR.

If you've got nothing else going on and need something to read, I'll share my knowledge with you and then we can compare notes if you're still with me at the end.


Early Expectations

My early money was on legendary "Jeopardy!" champion Ken Jennings - who I interviewed for the Deseret News in 2014 - but a few other names stood out, like longtime news anchor (and iconic Early 2000s reality TV show host) Anderson Cooper, piqued my interest.

One notable omission from the first guest host list was LeVar Burton, who has for some time been an Internet darling for Alex Trebek's ultimate replacement. Burton was kind of the television voice of my childhood education, as host of "Reading Rainbow," and I met him back at a Salt Lake Comic Convention a few years back, so I thought he'd do a great job, if given the chance.

The Internet did what it does and campaigned to get Burton a "Jeopardy!" hosting gig; an online petition at change.org garnered (at the time of writing this post) digital signatures of 267,377 people who wanted Burton to become the permanent host. In addition, Burton himself actively campaigned for the job on Twitter. Here's one of his tweets:



Eventually, Burton, along with several others, were tacked onto the list of guest hosts, for a total of 16 stand-ins. It was time to usher in a new era for one of America's favorite game shows.


A Brief Breakdown of the Guest Hosts

Ken Jennings had, arguably, the toughest job of all: being the first to step into the gigantic footprints left by the beloved Alex Trebek. But as a familiar face who has spent more time on that stage than any other contestant in the history of the show, he fit in seamlessly. His familiarity with the game was evident, his pacing was perfect and, although he wasn't Alex, he felt like the next best thing. Jennings remained at the podium for six weeks - three times more than any other guest host.

Replacing Jennings was the executive producer of "Jeopardy!," Mike Richards. I'd never heard of the guy, but he ended up being a great moderator, as well. He was fast-paced, friendly and interesting enough that I Googled him to learn more about him. At the time, I thought he'd also be good as a full-time host, but thought I'd reserve my final judgment until I'd seen more guest hosts.

Not all of the celebrities were a home run, though. The next two guest hosts were Katie Couric and Dr. Oz, and I didn't particularly care for either of them. Couric came off as an annoying mom trying to be cool (I still remember her referring to the contestants as "you little braniacs," and that just drove me absolutely nuts), and Dr. Oz had a great "game show host" voice but reportedly rubbed people the wrong way while he was there.

The immediate celebrity frontrunner, according to Twitter, was current NFL quarterback Aaron Rodgers - a Celebrity Jeopardy! champion with an unapologetic love of the show. First of all, there is no chance on the good, green Earth that Aaron Rodgers is quitting his day job to host a game show. Not a chance in the world. I'll give it to him, though. Rodgers actually ended up doing a good job. His presentation was rather slow and occasionally awkward. Basically, he came off as a guy who wasn't used to hosting trivia contests. But he was humorous and truly seemed to be enjoying himself, so I forgave him.

A handful of news anchors and reporters filled in, as well. I'm not familiar enough with news and politics to understand whether I'm supposed to hate these people, based on my personal beliefs or whatever, so I went in unbiased. Here's a quick breakdown of what I thought of them:

  • I will always love Anderson Cooper because of the classic reality TV show "The Mole" (Netflix just added the first two seasons of, by the way!). He was a solid host, though a bit stiff at times. He eventually lightened up a little bit, which was good to see.
  • I had no idea who Bill Whitaker was when he stepped onto the stage. Turns out he's on "60 Minutes." Although he didn't strike me as full-time-host caliber, his voice was extremely soothing and he just seemed like the nicest old grandpa or neighbor you could ever want. I really enjoyed his time on the show.
  • Savannah Guthrie from "NBC TODAY"... or as I like to call her, "Katie Couric, Jr." Not unlike Couric, I didn't particularly like Guthrie as guest host. She seemed happy to be there but I would have a hard time tuning in to watch her night after night.
  • I have something to say about most of the guest hosts, either good or bad. Such was not the case for George Stephanopolous ("Good Morning America"). I can't remember practically anything about his time on the show.
  • Also from the ranks of "Good Morning America" was Robin Roberts, who I was somewhat familiar with from her work on ESPN. I thought she did a good job on "Jeopardy!" She was enthusiastic (sometimes a bit too enthusiastic, maybe) and undeniably likable during her one-week stint.
  • The penultimate guest host was CNBC's David Faber - a "Celebrity Jeopardy!" champion in his own right! I was a bit behind when he took over but had seen people online saying that he was great. After wrapping up his episodes earlier today, I have to agree! He was fast-paced and not a distracting presence. I think he would make a very good host.
At the time I wrote this blog, sportscaster Joe Buck was serving as the final of the 16 guest hosts. I know that a lot of sports fans get irritated by him, but I don't mind him doing sports commentary and I have been liking him on "Jeopardy!" so far, too. He's clearly having a good time, and I always appreciate when Alex and others have found ways to inject humor and personality into the game without derailing the competition.

Two guest hosts that I was really pleased with were Miyam Bialik and Dr. Sanjay Gupta. I know that there are some aspects of Bialik's personal life that are a bit... odd.. but my favorite actor is Tom Cruise, so who am I to judge? She is essentially a real-life genius, so she knows her stuff, and she commanded the game well, unlike several other hosts. I knew nothing of Gupta's life or credits, despite his name sounding vaguely familiar, but he also came off as very well educated and unafraid of the big stage. His attempt to do The Sprinkler remains a top highlight of the Guest Host Era. I tried to find a GIF of it but failed.

There were two guest hosts that I thought let excitement and expectations get the best of them: former "Jeopardy! Tournament of Champions" winner Buzzy Cohen and our old pal, LeVar Burton. Buzzy, whose real name is not "Buzzy" and who literally mentioned to Alex Trebek during his tournament run that his dream was to replace him as host, seemed tickled pink to have a crack at running the show, but his pacing was sporadic and his enthusiasm seemed to get in the way of the game from time to time. I mean, he wasn't bad, but a little Buzzy goes a long way. We'll get to LeVar in just a second.

Last week, a report surfaced, saying that Mike Richards was in "advanced negotiations" to become the permanent host of "Jeopardy!" As you might imagine, the Internet was NOT HAPPY about this news, for a couple different reasons - particularly because LeVar Burton had not been selected. We live in a society where people love to get outraged about things, simply for the sake of it, and I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the people who were reportedly furious that LeVar Burton probably wasn't going to be the permanent host don't watch "Jeopardy!" and/or didn't see LeVar Burton as guest host. I'm happy to walk that one back if somebody can prove me wrong, but that's the assumption I'm going to make.

My man LeVar put himself in a really tough spot by campaigning so hard for the job. I'd say that the bar was set higher for him than it was for anyone else, other than maybe Ken Jennings - but he did it to himself. So how'd he do?

He was stiff. He was awkward. He was slow. He randomly shouted the verdict of contestants' responses a couple times. Once, he accidentally told someone he got a question wrong, then had to correct himself immediately. He had long, awkward pauses a couple times, including during Final Jeopardy! on his last show. It was really rough, honestly. He's a super nice guy and I wished him nothing but the best for this gig, but it was not good. If you're going to get upset about something in the comments section of a post today, the "LeVar Burton Must Replace Alex Trebek" hill is definitely not the one you want to die on. He wasn't the best guest host. Not by a long shot. And it's too bad. He set himself up to win and didn't even come close.

The Official Announcement

Earlier today, "Jeopardy!" announced their official decision. In an unprecedented move, the show has decided to move forward with not one but two permanent hosts: Mike Richards and Miyam Bialik. Richards will handle the day-to-day, syndicated programming, and Bialik will appear on all "spin-offs," such as prime-time events and tournaments.

Personally, I love this move. I had Richards and Bialik ranked very high on my list, which we'll get to in a moment, and I think they'll do as good a job as anyone.

I know that this decision is causing a lot of dissention among fans (or, as explained previously, people who claim to watch simply as an excuse to argue). People are still pissed that it's not LeVar Burton, but he wasn't good enough. Even if you're the most qualified person in the universe, if you go in and bomb the interview, sometimes you don't get chosen. That's life, bruv. I'm not going to beat that dead horse any further.

People have got issues with the lack of diversity in televised trivia. I saw one random person complaining on Twitter that "Jeopardy!" had a perfectly diverse candidate in LeVar Burton and were opting to go with "a generic white guy" instead. Don't tell anyone I said that, but... isn't that racist? "We shouldn't choose this person because they're a white man." Am I wrong? I say you hire the best person for the job, regardless of gender, race or any other factor. But hey, what do I know?

I was fine with the rumor that it was just going to be Mike Richards because I thought he performed really well "in the interview," so to speak. The fact that we're getting two of my top candidates is awesome news, in my opinion.

Guest Host Power Rankings

As of this exact moment in time, Joe Buck currently still has two episodes left in his stay, so the final section of this blog is subject (but unlikely) to change. I was planning on saving this blog until the weekend, once the Guest Host Era was over, but when the big announcement dropping this afternoon, I needed to fast-track the post.

With no further ado and with no more gilding the lily, here is how I ranked the "Jeopardy!" guest hosts, from first to worst:

1. Ken Jennings


2. Mike Richards

3. Mayim Bialik

4. Sanjay Gupta

5. David Faber

6. Aaron Rodgers

7. Joe Buck

8. Robin Roberts

9. Anderson Cooper

10. LeVar Burton

11. Bill Whitaker

12. Buzzy Cohen

13. Savannah Guthrie

14. Dr. Oz

15. Katie Couric

16. George Stephanopoulos


How'd I Do?

If you're a TV trivia junkie like me, feel free to let me know if I got the list right. Leave me a comment if you think I got it wrong. You can tweet me (here and here). You can text me. You can look me up on the ol' Facebook, if you truly desire.

But do me a favor and just phrase your feedback in the form of a question.

Until next time.

Tuesday, June 22, 2021

The Bitter Pill 4: Another Playoff Choke

It's a well-documented fact that I am cursed as a sports fan. Cursed as a human, really, because I discovered at a very young age that I like sports. And sports end in disappointment 99 percent of the time. In my 34 years of life, sports teams for which I have an active rooting interest have won championships two times:


Oh, and then there was Real Salt Lake, which won the Major League Soccer Cup in 2009, and although that's my local soccer team, I wouldn't classify myself as an actual fan because I rarely watch them play.

The University of Utah beat Alabama in the 2009 Sugar Bowl, but I didn't start attending The U until that fall, so I wasn't technically a student at that point.

I became a fan of the Texas Rangers the year after they lost in two consecutive World Series, and they haven't come close to making it back any time since then, 10 years ago. However, Rougned Odor landed a really solid punch on Jose Bautista in 2016, which was cool.

I stopped cheering for the Chicago Cubs after following them for my entire childhood about two or three years before they finally won a World Series. It got to a point when I just couldn't handle all the losing anymore.

Of course, there are my beloved Utah Jazz, which lost to Michael Jordan's Chicago Bulls in back-to-back NBA championships, but that's another story for another time.

"This Could Be the Year"

This year, I really thought the Jazz had a chance to go all the way. I really, truly did. There was a stretch of the season where we won, like, 23 straight home games, I think, and we were just blowing fools out by 20 points every night. It was so much fun to watch. Honestly, if the Jazz didn't go up by 20 at some point in the game, it was almost disappointing to me. I remember that there was a point in time - I think it was February 25 or something? - where I actually had the thought, "This could be the year."

Yikes. For the first time in my life, I actually thought those words.

But can you blame me? The Jazz were the best team in the National Basketball Association for nearly the entire 2020-21 season, finishing with the outright best record in the league for the first time in franchise history. This earned them the #1 seed for the playoffs and home court advantage throughout.

There was some speculation and discussion about whether the Jazz would keep playing hard through the end of the season to clinch that top seed - and whether they even should. It sometimes becomes a controversial strategy for teams to "tank" (intentionally lose games) to position themselves in a favorable postseason matchup, sometimes to the ire of basketball fans. Such was not the case for this year's Utah Jazz; I was proud to see that we kept fighting to the very end, securing the best record by a half game over the Phoenix Suns.

I thought, if nothing else, we could hang our proverbial hat on the fact that we were, statistically, the best team in the league this year. We played really well all season - despite nagging injuries to several key players - had three All-Stars for the first time since the 1980s, and ultimately had a Coach of the Year finalist in Quin Snyder; two finalists for Sixth Man of the Year, Joe Ingles and eventual winner Jordan Clarkson; and the now-three-time Defensive Player of the Year, Rudy Gobert. Without a doubt, this regular season was one for the record books. And it felt good. Really good.


The Injury Bug Strikes... But Would it Even Matter?

One of the few major concerns, heading into the playoffs, were injuries to the Jazz's two most important offensive players: Donovan Mitchell, who missed the last 16 games of the regular season due to ankle pain; and Mike Conley, whose recurring hamstring soreness kept him in and out of action throughout some stretches of the regular season and forced him to miss Game 1 of the first round, against his former team, the Memphis Grizzlies.

The Jazz would go on to lose Game 1 against Memphis, at home, which was quite disconcerting. In my mind, Memphis was a great matchup for the Jazz; we beat them three times in a six-day span during the regular season (no exaggeration), but my prediction of a four-game sweep in the first round did not come to pass..

But Conley returned for Game 2, and the Jazz beat Memphis four straight times, eliminating the Grizzlies in five games. Because that matchup ended earlier than other Western Conference series, the Jazz were forced to wait six days for the winner of the Clippers-Mavericks series. Ultimately, the nationally acclaimed Los Angeles Clippers moved on, which didn't scare me at all. The talking heads on sports radio love teams from big markets like L.A. and always favor them in the postseason, so their words meant nothing to me.

Unlike the Jazz, the Clippers tanked their final few games of the regular season - most likely to avoid having to play their rivals, the Lakers, in the first round - and it took them a full seven-game series to squeak past the Dallas. Well, the Jazz were clearly a better team than the Mavericks in the regular season, so I figured the Jazz would win the second round series convincingly, in five or six games, and move on to the Western Conference Finals for the first time since 2009.

Meanwhile, LeBron James' Los Angeles Clippers got ousted in the first round by the 2-seed Phoenix Suns, which was hilarious, and the Golden State Warriors didn't even make the playoffs this season, so things were looking really good for the Jazz. Certainly, a Utah/Phoenix showdown in the Western Conference Finals was imminent.

The Jazz won the first two games against the Clippers, thanks to some incredible offensive performances by Donovan Mitchell and a Game 1-winning block by Rudy Gobert. What was better? The Jazz had done it without Mike Conley even lacing up his high-tops. The hamstring injury keep him sidelined for the first two games and, thankfully, it didn't hurt us. I did get a bit concerned, though, when Paul George collided with Donovan with seven seconds left in a game that was already out of reach for the Clippers. The game was all but over, yet there was our superstar, writing on the ground in pain. Donovan went down hard and looked like his ankle was really bothering him. However, he'd have a couple days to rest up and we'd be all right. Tired bodies notwithstanding, we were up 2-0 and things were looking good.


With injuries piling up for the remaining teams around the league, if we could just get our guys back up to full strength, we'd have an amazing chance at making a run to the Finals, and our best shot, arguably, ever to actually win it. "Rest up, boys," I pleaded, "and take care of business."


There Was No Way the Clippers Would Beat Us... Right??

Two games in, I was very excited. All I wanted was a split of the next two games in Los Angeles, and the Jazz would finish it off in five games, I told myself. There was no way the Clippers would beat this Jazz team four times out of the next five games. Not a chance.

The series shifted to Hollywood, and the Jazz got thumped in Game 3. It was ok, I thought. In fact, I wasn't even stressed at all! Just win Game 4 and bring it back home to close it out. Easy.

Game 4 was ugly. Conley remained out due to injury, and the Jazz just couldn't figure it out. The series came back to Utah, tied 2-2. The Jazz came out on fire in the first half. Bojan Bogdonavic seemingly could not miss. The Jazz shot upwards of 60 percent from the field in the first 24 minutes. But we went into halftime with a measly five-point lead. Shooting the way we did, you would have thought we'd be up by double digits, at least. Coming back out in the second half, it was like we forgot how to put the ball in the hoop. The Clippers kept pouring on the offense and the Jazz couldn't get any stops. We lost Game 5 in front of our notoriously loud home crowd and would have to head back to California for Game 6 with our backs against the wall.

Spoiler: Game 6 was very similar to Game 5. The Jazz came out blistering hot. I even tweeted, "The Jazz are not messing around." We built a 25-point lead at one point. It was glorious. "Stomp the throat," I texted my family. Just keep the pedal to the metal and bring it back home for Game 7. In the second half, however, the Jazz made some very interesting defensive decisions. And when I say that, I mean that we, for some dang reason, chose to let a Clippers player stand wide open in the corner on every single play. It's ok to do that sometimes if the guy you're leaving open can't shoot. But guess what? The Clippers COULD. NOT. MISS. They should have called me up and put me in because I totally would have stood in that corner with my hands up. That's more than anybody on the court was doing!

The villain this time around was not Michael Jordan. It wasn't even Denver Nuggets stars Jamal Murray or Nikola Jokic, like it was last season WHEN THE JAZZ BLEW A 3-1 LEAD. I DIDN'T EVEN BLOG ABOUT THAT ONE! No, no. It was some dude named Terance Mann. Like, I honestly didn't even know who this guy was a couple weeks ago. But we left him open time and time and time and time and time again and he lit us up for a career high 39 points. That's more points than he ever even scored in a college game. Now, the Jazz are notorious for letting random no-name players get career highs, but in an elimination game with our season - and possibly an NBA championship - on the line?!? Terance Mann?? He only missed six shots in the entire game, and he was shooting a lot. That's an incredible night, no matter who you are. And we let him absolutely wreck us.

Needless to say, the Jazz lost their fourth straight game to these Clippers -- a game in which their best player, Kawhi Leonard, did not even play, mind you! -- and we got bounced from the playoffs.

Let this sink in: we played our butts off in the regular season got beaten in the second round by a team that tanked, heading into the playoffs. Ugh. So dumb.

Also frustrating: we were back, somewhat, at full strength for Game 6, in the sense that Mike and Donovan were both playing, but you could tell that Mike was kind of just going through the motions (bless him for even trying), and Donovan looked like he was maybe 70 or 80 percent healthy at best for the final two or three games of the series.

And we lost to a team led by freaking Paul George (who will go down as the second most overrated first-ballot Hall of Famer of all time, next to Tracy McGrady) and some dude named Terance Mann, who won't even be in the league anymore in three years. Mark my words on that one. Why. Why does this happen.

Editor's note: Terance Mann had a whopping 9 points in Game 1 of the Western Conference Finals.

I was basically furious, but I held it together because this is just the kind of thing that the Jazz do, every single year. I even predicted it on two separate occasions, earlier that day. "Double-digit Jazz loss." I knew it was going to happen, and then it did.


Oh, What Could Have Been...

Of all the years for us to choke, why did it have to be this year? No LeBron, no Steph Curry, home court advantage all the way... This was our year! After all the bull crap we had to go through when Rudy Gobert tested positive for COVID-19 last season, resulting in the complete shut-down of sports in North America... In a year where a flock of birds hit the team's charter plane and caused them to make an emergency landing... In a year where LeBron and Kevin Durant openly mocked the Utah Jazz during the selection of All-Star teams... Man, there should have been such an incredible "30 For 30" documentary about this team. "The Team of Destiny," they would have called us. The team that defied all odds and all the hate and disbelief from the national media. That should have been us. That should have been this year. The path was practically paved in gold.

Phoenix would have been tough, but the league ruled Chris Paul out for (so far) at least Game 1 of the Western Conference Finals for COVID-19 health and safety protocols, and the Suns without CP3 did not worry me. The only two teams I really didn't want to face late in the playoffs were Philadelphia and Brooklyn, both of which were eliminated in the Eastern Conference within days of the Jazz losing. If we could have made it to the championship, we would have gone up against either Milwaukee or Atlanta (the two teams currently facing off in the Eastern Conference Finals). Man, that would have been perfect. Could have been Jazz in five. Sickening. Soul-shattering for lifelong fans like me.

It's just so frustrating to spend all season watching the games - and I try not to miss many games, if we're playing well, which we were! - and to pour in countless hours of my attention, then have them rip my stupid heart out and stomp on it over and over again.

Why didn't the Jazz make the appropriate defensive adjustments in the second half of those second-round games? How could they play so well in the first two quarters, then just abruptly stop making threes? Why couldn't the injuries to our star players have come at the beginning of the season, not at the end of it? Couldn't we channel that mid-season magic one more time and run a string of eight or 10 consecutive home victories? Is any of that too much to ask?

Pain. It's just... pain.

As my friend Scott Aylett and I discussed after the abrupt end to the Jazz's season, there are a million things that would be more satisfying than to get emotionally invested in sports ever again. We could stare at the wall and watch paint dry. We could go kick some dirt around for 15 minutes, which could possibly provide some unexpected joy. There are movies and TV shows and video games and books out there that will give a tremendous amount more satisfaction in a two-hour span than can ever be felt at the end of a basketball season.

Why was I cursed to be this way? Why must I continue to follow sports, year after year? How could I be so foolish?

It sucks to think it, but maybe it's true: if the Jazz couldn't get it done this year, with everything we had going for us, maybe it's never going to happen at all.

Yet, will I keep watching? Of course. What kind of a stupid question is that?


Death, Taxes and Eternal Sadness

I used to joke that 80 percent of the sadness in my life came from being a sports fan, and the other 20 percent came from women, but I'm married now, which means that sports account for all of the sadness I experience, and that's a straight-up fact. It's a painful, painful life that I've chosen.

All I can hope now is that I am reincarnated as a non-sports fan in my next life. Or as a monkey. That might be kind of exciting, too.

*****

Related Blogs:

If, for some sick and twisted reason, you kept reading until the end of this blog and thought it was funny and/or entertaining, first of all, how dare you take joy in my pain? Second of all, you might find these other blogs interesting:

Saturday, April 10, 2021

#140Characters: Wrestlemania 37 preview


In what has become somewhat of a tradition, with the exception of last year, when COVID-19 hit and threw everything into disarray, we here at Signs of the Times generally like to give either a preview or recap of Wrestlemania each year (sometimes both), even though we assume that there is literally no one out there that both reads our blog and watches professional wrestling. Nevertheless, we're here once again, on the eve of Wrestlemania Saturday - right up against it, as they say in the business - with about an hour and a half to go until showtime, at the time of starting this post.

Quickly, we thought we'd preview all of the matches for this weekend's beat-em-up festivities, just in case you decide to plop down on the couch for seven or eight hours to watch people fight. To make it even quicker for us and easier for you, we're gonna sum up all of our responses in 140 characters or less.

Let's get to it!


How has the WWE been affected by COVID-19?

Since April 2020, WWE programming has been without live fans. Last year's 'Mania took place in an empty arena. Tonight, the fans are back!

How has Wrestlemania, specifically, needed to be altered?

WM 36 was split into 2 nights & featured 2 wacky, pre-recorded, "cinematic" matches. Still multi-night now but nothing will be pre-recorded.

How can I watch Wrestlemania 37 this weekend?

WWE Network has gone the way of the dodo. All WWE content has migrated to NBC's "Peacock." You can sign up for Peacock premium super cheap.


Wrestlemania 37 - Saturday Night

WWE Championship Match: Bobby Lashley (c) vs Drew McIntyre

Background Information: 

Drew got the title at WM 36 in an empty arena. Lashley's a relatively new champ but some of his allies have recently turned on him. Ominous.

What to Expect:

These are two of the strongest guys in the company. The rivalry has gotten quite heated & they'll beat the living heck out of each other.

 Winner Prediction:

Would love to see McIntyre win the championship in front of an actual audience. He has absolutely carried the company through the COVID era.

 

Bad Bunny & Damian Priest vs The Miz & John Morrison

Background Information: 

Miz & Morrison are jokers. Bad Bunny is this year's celebrity appearance. He's not an actual wrestler but he'll bring in a lot of eyeballs.

What to Expect:

Lots of hijinks. Damian Priest will do the heavy lifting. I'd be shocked if Bad Bunny spent 5 minutes inside the ring, actually fighting.

 Winner Prediction:

There is not a chance in the world that Bad Bunny loses this match. He'll inevitably cover Miz for the 1-2-3.

 

WWE RAW Tag Team Championship Match: The New Day (Kofi Kingston & Xavier Woods) (c) vs AJ Styles & Omos

Background Information: 

New Day = multi-time champions. Styles/Omos have never fought an actual match together, but Omos is gigantic and seemingly indestructible.

What to Expect:

Styles will likely work most of the match, building suspense for what damage Omos will do in his first WWE fight. Expect destruction.

 Winner Prediction:

Upset alert! New Day have much more experience but Styles and Omos winning the belts would be the biggest surprise of the weekend.

 

Steel Cage Match: Braun Strowman vs Shane McMahon

Background Information: 

Shane has been bullying Braun for weeks, calling him stupid and constantly pranking him, but he'll have nowhere to run within a steel cage.

What to Expect:

Despite being locked in a cage, there will very likely be outside interference. Also, Shane will undoubtedly pull off a death-defying stunt.

 Winner Prediction:

Almost 100% certainty that WWE doubles down on their anti-bullying stance, having Strowman tear McMahon limb from limb. Braun wins, easy.

 

Cesaro vs Seth Rollins

Background Information: 

Rollins, fresh off paternity leave, has had a hard time winning over potential allies. Cesaro has stood up to him on several occasions.

What to Expect:

Expect to see perennial underdog Cesaro swing the villainous Rollins around by his boots for a considerable amount of time. It's hilarious.

 Winner Prediction:

Cesaro will probably pick up the win here, unless somebody comes out to aid Rollins, forming a "heel" faction for post-Mania storylines.

 

Lana & Naomi vs Dana Brooke & Mandy Rose vs The Riott Squad (Liv Morgan & Ruby Riott) vs Natalya & Tamina vs Billie Kay & Carmella

Background Information: 

This is simply a way to put as many women on-screen this weekend as possible. The winner gets a title shot on Sunday night.

What to Expect:

Great time for a bathroom break for all the fans attending the event in person. Most likely will end up as the worst match of the weekend.

 Winner Prediction:

Natalya & Tamina have been getting lots of screen time lately, so they're probably the favorites. Maybe oddball combo Billie Kay & Carmella?

 

SmackDown Women's Championship Match: Sasha Banks (c) vs Bianca Belair

Background Information: 

Bianca Belair, who many see as the future of the women's division, won the 2020 Royal Rumble to earn a spot in Saturday night's main event.

What to Expect:

Bianca calls herself "The EST of WWE." Expect her to showcase why she's the fastest, strongest, smartest, etc. Should be a solid match.

 Winner Prediction:

Wrestlemania is the most logical PPV of the year for MAJOR title changes. WWE can show their faith in Belair by giving her the belt tonight.

 

Wrestlemania 37 - Sunday Night

RAW Women's Championship Match: Asuka (c) vs Rhea Ripley

Background Information: 

Very little build-up. Ripley is making her main roster PPV debut at WM 37 to face Asuka, one of the most dominant women in the business.

What to Expect:

This could be a dark horse contender for Match of the Weekend. Ripley and Asuka are very good. Should be a great fight. Fans will love it.

 Winner Prediction:

Again, WWE can cement their trust in Ripley as a face of the future here, but not EVERY title can change hands this weekend... right?

 

The Fiend (w/ Alexa Bliss) vs Randy Orton

Background Information: 

Orton has attempted to light The Fiend on fire repeatedly over the past few months - and actually succeeded once - but now HE'S BAAAAAAAACK!

What to Expect:

This one is gonna be gimmicky & weird as heck. It's one spot where I bet WWE wishes they could still do a pre-recorded match. NOT FOR KIDS.

 Winner Prediction:

Bray Wyatt is notorious for losing big pay-per-view matches, so I bet he wins this one, but I've been wrong before. Many, many times.

 

WWE Intercontinental Championship Match - Nigerian Drum Fight: Big E (c) vs Apollo Crews

Background Information: 

Apollo, for some reason, feels slighted by Big E, and his character has also recently reverted back to, apparently, his African roots. Odd.

What to Expect:

I literally have no idea what a "Nigerian Drum Fight" is, so your guess is as good as mine.

 Winner Prediction:

I think Big E will win this one. They've got to let SOME wrestlers retain their titles this weekend.

 

Kevin Owens vs Sami Zayn (w/ Logan Paul)

Background Information: 

Zayn alleges that WWE has been conspiring against him. Has his own camera crew. His real-life BFF & on-screen enemy Owens has had enough.

What to Expect:

Owens really wanted to jump off the Raymond James Stadium pirate ship last year before COVID hit. Bet that happens this year, somehow.

 Winner Prediction:

Don't know how yet, exactly, but I bet celeb guest Logan Paul  goes rogue to influence the decision and Kevin Owens walks away victorious.

 

WWE United States Championship Match: Riddle (c) vs Sheamus

Background Information: 

Battle of the stereotypes: Riddle is a stoner bro and Sheamus is an Irish brawler. Another instance of very little build-up for this match.

What to Expect:

One of several relatively straight-forward fights this weekend. I don't particularly see this one as being memorable. Bathroom break!

 Winner Prediction:

I've got Riddle winning, simply because this is an easy title to keep on a current champion. Doesn't mean I like him, though.

 

WWE Women's Tag Team Championship Match: Nia Jax & Shayna Baszler (w/ Reginald) (c) vs [Saturday Night Winner - TBA]

Background Information: 

Jax & Baszler will face the winner of the big women's tag team brawl from Saturday night. They'll have their stooge Reginald at ringside.

What to Expect:

Domination by Jax and Baszler with multiple attempts at interference by Reginald.

 Winner Prediction:

I don't believe that any of the teams featured on Saturday night are ready to take the titles off of the current champs.

 

WWE Universal Championship Match: Roman Reigns (w/ Paul Heyman) (c) vs Edge vs Daniel Bryan

Background Information: 

Edge won the Men's Royal Rumble to earn his way into this match. Fan-favorite Bryan complained until he was granted a spot, as well.

What to Expect:

Overall, should be a pretty good match. It's almost certainly the match WWE most wants to be talked about by fans when all is said and done.

 Winner Prediction:

Reigns loses. This is the time for it. I want Edge, but pre-Mania programming has really been slanted toward Bryan becoming a new champ.


BOOM! There it is! We've got the blog done with 12 minutes to spare before Saturday night's festivities begin. I better post this really quickly, fire up the George Foreman grill and boot up the ol' Playstation 5. It's showtime.

To those of you who are watching, let me know what you think about everything that goes down. Wrestlemania is easily the biggest event of the WWE calendar year, although it isn't always the most fun or the most well-received by fans. Who knows what this weekend has in store?

Leave a comment below, follow me on Twitter (here and here) or hit me up on Facebook. Gotta go. Have a good one!

Saturday, February 27, 2021

WandaVision's Sitcom Theme Finally Explained

If you haven't been watching "WandaVision" on Disney+ there are a couple likely reasons: you don't subscribe to Disney+, you don't like Marvel or you think that the show's slapstick sitcom theme looked stupid.

Believe me. I hear you. Initially, I didn't want anything to do with "WandaVision" because I'm generally not a fan of sitcoms, and I thought that the trailer and promotional spots leading up to the debut episode didn't do the show any favors. I've since changed my stance, as you can read in my "First Impressions" blog, and I've actually thoroughly enjoyed "WandaVision," for the most part. Admittedly, not all episodes have been home runs, but if you've been patient enough to stick with it, I think the show has taken the Marvel Cinematic Universe in an interesting direction that sets future movies and programming down a very interesting path.

If you're still not sold on the idea because you're either hesitant to start watching in the first place or because you watched the first episode or two and hated the black-and-white shenanigans, some good news came in Episode 8. They finally explained what was up with all the sitcoms.

Be warned: major spoilers for "WandaVision" will follow, so, as always, only keep reading if you're caught up with the show or truly don't care.


Episode 8 ("Previously On") took a break from the set-in-a-sitcom scenario in which "WandaVision" has typically taken place, and instead, as the name suggests, featured a series of flashbacks into Wanda's life, as a potential means of explaining how she developed the immense power it took to create the fictional suburbia of Westview.

We came to learn that TV time with the family was a meaningful aspect of life in the Maximoff home. Wartime Sokovia was a pretty depressing place. I mean, at one point, Mrs. Maximoff looks out the window and sees a shootout taking place in the streets right below their apartment. Taking time as a family to sit down and laugh at the television was a good way to not only take their minds off the violence but also practice their English.

During the first flashback, a case of DVDs is shown, with the following TV series inside:

  • Bewitched
  • I Love Lucy
  • Malcolm in the Middle
  • I Dream of Jeannie
  • The Addams Family
  • Who's the Boss?
Ultimately, the family decides to watch an old re-run of "The Dick Van Dyke Show."

Later on in Episode 8, Wanda is shown at the Age of Ultron HYDRA facility, re-watching an episode of "The Brady Bunch." In another flashback, which would have likely taken place around the time of Captain America: Civil War, Wanda (and later, Vision) get a few laughs out of an episode of "Malcolm in the Middle." Wanda uses this moment to teach Vision about slapstick comedy.

Other sitcoms that have been heavily parodied throughout the course of Season 1 include "Full House" (Episode 5) and "Modern Family" (Episode 7), as well as the theme from "The Munsters," which influenced the catchiest song of the season during one major reveal.

Episode 8 shows Wanda arriving in Westview, a place where she planned on moving with Vision so they could grow old together, and collapsing from grief (not unlike what she did after the death of her brother in Age of Ultron) as she realized that their goal was now unattainable. The radiating burst of "Chaos Magic" somewhat unintentionally turned Westview into Wanda's ideal version of the classic American neighborhood, based on the old TV shows that helped her deal with a tough childhood, growing up.

*****

So there you have it. Does that help the show make any more sense? Are you liking "WandaVision"? Still hating it? I have a couple ex-coworkers who are die-hard Marvel fans - like, everything-Marvel-touches-turns-to-gold-and-DC-sucks-worse-than-anything die-hard Marvel fans - and I've been surprised to hear that they're still not sold on this show. Crazy.

What have been your favorite sitcom references and Easter eggs so far? What are your theories and hot takes? And don't tell me you knew it was Agatha All Along, because I had never heard that name until literally the night before Episode 7, so if you tell me you knew that the entire time, I simply don't believe you.

Oh, also, if anyone knows where Dottie is or what she's been up to, let me know because... #WheresDottie?

Anyway, let us know what you think in the comments section below, on Twitter (here and here) or look me up on Facebook.

Until next time,

Sunday, February 7, 2021

Super Bowl LV prop bets

 

PICK THE WINNER & SCORE

Who will win the Super Bowl? (3 points)

  •  Kansas City Chiefs
  • Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Predict the final score (Difference within 5 points: 5; Within 10 points: 3; Greater than 10 points: 1)

  • _______ - _______


PRE-GAME

Will the National Anthem be longer or shorter than it was last year (1:50)? (1 point)

  • Shorter
  • Longer

What will be the result of the coin toss? (1 point)

  • Heads
  • Tails


FOOTBALL GAME

Which team will score first? (1 point)

  • Kansas City Chiefs
  • Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Which type of scoring play will occur first?

  • 1 point:
    • Rushing TD
    • Passing TD
  • 3 points:
    • Field Goal
  • 5 points:
    • Defensive/Special Teams

Which quarterback will have more passing yards? (1 point)

  • Patrick Mahomes
  • Tom Brady

Will either team attempt a trick play? (1 point)

  • Yes
  • No

How many combined turnovers will occur during the game? (1 point)

  • 0-2 turnovers
  • 3 or more turnovers

Will both teams, combined, score more rushing TDs or passing TDs? (1 point)

  • Rushing TDs
  • Passing TDs

Will the winning team dump Gatorade on their coach? If so, what color will it be?

  • 1 point:
    • Red
    • Blue
  • 3 points:
    • Any other color
    • No Gatorade/Not shown

Will the MVP of the game be an offensive or defensive player? (1 point)

  • Offensive
  • Defensive

Who will the MVP thank first? (1 point)

  • Friends/Family
  • Teammates/Coaches
  • God

COMMERCIALS

The first commercial for a streaming service will be by… (1 point)

  • Netflix
  • Any other company

The first superhero to be shown in a commercial will be… (1 point)

  • Marvel
  • Other
The first commercial about food will be by... (1 point)
  • McDonald's
  • Any other company

Will there be at least 3 commercials with talking animals? (1 point)

  • Yes
  • No

Will Jimmy Fallon appear in a Super Bowl commercial at any point? (1 point)

  • Yes
  • No

Will any commercial ever specifically state that it is a “Super Bowl commercial”? (1 point)

  • Yes
  • No


HALFTIME SHOW / MISCELLANEOUS

What color will The Weeknd’s shoes be? (1 point)

  • White
  • Any other color

When will The Weeknd sing his hit song “Blinding Lights”? (1 point)

  • First
  • At any other point

How many times will President Joe Biden be mentioned during the game? (1 point)

  • Once or less
  • Twice or more

Will either of the commentators be wearing a striped tie? (1 point)

  • Yes
  • No


FINAL RESULTS

____ out of 35 maximum points